137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26667700)
1. ANTHROPOMETRY TO IDENTIFY HIGH VISCERAL FAT AREA IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN.
Gondim Pitanga FJ; Seara Pitanga CP; Calçada Dias Gabriel RE; Cristina Beck C; Rodrigues Moreira MH
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Dec; 32(6):2535-9. PubMed ID: 26667700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods of predicting visceral fat in Brazilian adults and older adults: a comparison between anthropometry and computerized tomography.
Roriz AK; de Oliveira CC; Moreira PA; Eickemberg M; Medeiros JM; Sampaio LR
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2011 Mar; 61(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 22097284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of obesity indices in screening Chinese postmenopausal women for metabolic syndrome.
Liu P; Ma F; Lou H; Zhu Y
Menopause; 2014 May; 21(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 23963310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of anthropometric indicators as predictors of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adolescents.
Oliveira RG; Guedes DP
BMC Pediatr; 2018 Feb; 18(1):33. PubMed ID: 29415673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of anthropometric indices for the screening of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in pre- and postmenopausal women.
Hong SH; Hwang SY; Kim JA; Lee YB; Roh E; Kim NH; Seo JA; Kim SG; Kim NH; Choi KM; Baik SH; Yoo HJ
Menopause; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 31613826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of the sagittal abdominal diameter as a predictor of visceral abdominal fat.
Sampaio LR; Simões EJ; Assis AM; Ramos LR
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol; 2007 Aug; 51(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 17934666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [ACCURACY PARAMETERS AS INDICATORS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC ADIPOSITY VISCERAL SCHEDULED FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL EQUATION].
Lira Santos A; Araújo Tavares de Sá CM; Calado Brito D; Lourenço Batista C; Kétteryn Maior Evangelista da Costa M; Araújo Gomes de Lima KB; Magalhães Souza J; Tenório Ramos IL
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Nov; 32(5):2046-53. PubMed ID: 26545659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive models for estimating visceral fat: The contribution from anthropometric parameters.
Pinho CPS; Diniz ADS; de Arruda IKG; Leite APDL; Petribú MMV; Rodrigues IG
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0178958. PubMed ID: 28742086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by anthropometric measures in Tehranian adults: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Mirmiran P; Esmaillzadeh A; Azizi F
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1110-8. PubMed ID: 15280905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Anthropometric measurements as predictive indicators of metabolic risk in a Mexican population].
Domínguez-Reyes T; Quiroz-Vargas I; Salgado-Bernabé AB; Salgado-Goytia L; Muñoz-Valle JF; Parra-Rojas I
Nutr Hosp; 2017 Feb; 34(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 28244778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio reference percentiles for abdominal obesity among Greek adolescents.
Bacopoulou F; Efthymiou V; Landis G; Rentoumis A; Chrousos GP
BMC Pediatr; 2015 May; 15():50. PubMed ID: 25935716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Waist-to-hip ratio is better at predicting subclinical atherosclerosis than body mass index and waist circumference in postmenopausal women.
Lee HJ; Hwang SY; Hong HC; Ryu JY; Seo JA; Kim SG; Kim NH; Choi DS; Baik SH; Choi KM; Yoo HJ
Maturitas; 2015 Mar; 80(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 25631349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screen value of anthropometric indices for hyperglycemia].
Liu X; Li S; Zhang Y
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2012 Nov; 41(6):986-91, 1008. PubMed ID: 23424882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of abdominal visceral obesity from anthropometric parameters using receiver operating characteristic curves].
Jia W; Lu J; Xiang K; Bao Y; Lu H; Chen L
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 23(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 12015103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is visceral abdominal fat area a better indicator for hyperglycemic risk? Results from the Pinggu Metabolic Disease Study.
Zhang F; Li Y; Zhao Y; Zhou X; Ji L
J Diabetes Investig; 2020 Jul; 11(4):888-895. PubMed ID: 31981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal Cutoff Points of Anthropometric Parameters to Identify High Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Korean Adults.
Kim SH; Choi H; Won CW; Kim BS
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Jan; 31(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 26770039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anthropometric indicators as predictors of pelvic floor muscle distress in young women.
Scarabelot KS; da Silva Pereira F; Pelegrini A; Tuon T; Virtuoso JF
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Sep; 39(7):1949-1957. PubMed ID: 32628314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio and body mass index as indicators of impaired glucose tolerance and as risk factors for type-2 diabetes mellitus.
Łopatyński J; Mardarowicz G; Szcześniak G
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2003; 58(1):413-9. PubMed ID: 15315025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visceral Adiposity Index is not Superior over Anthropometric Parameters with regards to Inflammation in Healthy Adolescent Girls.
Klisic A; Kavaric N; Bjelakovic B; Zvrko E; Soldatovic I; Kotur-Stevuljevic J
P R Health Sci J; 2018 Dec; 37(4):195-199. PubMed ID: 30548054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anthropometric indices of central obesity how discriminators of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Costa EC; Sá JC; Soares EM; Lemos TM; Maranhão TM; Azevedo GD
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jan; 28(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 21958393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]