790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26668512)
1. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of short-term outcomes and three yearsurvival between total minimally invasive McKeown and dual-incision esophagectomy.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
Thorac Cancer; 2017 Mar; 8(2):80-87. PubMed ID: 28052566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhao Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 12(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 21186282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure].
Mao T; Fang WT; Gu ZT; Yao F; Guo XF; Chen WH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):922-5. PubMed ID: 22990924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development Pattern on Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and 2-year Survival Analysis.
Zhao Y; Dong X; Cong B; Peng C; Sun Q; Hao Y; Zhao X
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 64(7):606-610. PubMed ID: 26765245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
