These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

799 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26668512)

  • 1. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
    Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of short-term outcomes and three yearsurvival between total minimally invasive McKeown and dual-incision esophagectomy.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    Thorac Cancer; 2017 Mar; 8(2):80-87. PubMed ID: 28052566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Gao Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhao Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 12(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 21186282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
    Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
    Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure].
    Mao T; Fang WT; Gu ZT; Yao F; Guo XF; Chen WH
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):922-5. PubMed ID: 22990924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
    Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
    Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development Pattern on Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and 2-year Survival Analysis.
    Zhao Y; Dong X; Cong B; Peng C; Sun Q; Hao Y; Zhao X
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 64(7):606-610. PubMed ID: 26765245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.