These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

671 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26670605)

  • 1. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
    Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
    Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries.
    Rathore S; Tyndall D; Wright J; Everett E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 22184471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
    Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
    Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Extraoral Bitewings Compared to Intraoral Bitewings in Detection of Interproximal Caries.
    Felemban OM; Loo CY; Ramesh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33893259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cone beam CT scans with enhanced photostimulated phosphor plate images in the detection of root fracture of endodontically treated teeth.
    Bechara B; McMahan CA; Noujeim M; Faddoul T; Moore WS; Teixeira FB; Geha H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120404. PubMed ID: 23625067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of image enhancements and dual observers on proximal caries detection.
    Gray BM; Mol A; Zandona A; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):e133-e139. PubMed ID: 28283097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
    Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.