273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26670673)
21. [Risk factors of permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients undergoing transabdominal anterior resection with temporary stoma].
Wang XY; Tao R; Qu Z; Zhang Y; Deng YM; Yi JN; Deng MY; Liu WD
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 23(8):780-785. PubMed ID: 32810950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.
Räsänen M; Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Carpelan-Holmström M; Lepistö A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1323-8. PubMed ID: 26111635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.
Matthiessen P; Hallböök O; Andersson M; Rutegård J; Sjödahl R
Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):462-9. PubMed ID: 15521937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Jutesten H; Draus J; Frey J; Neovius G; Lindmark G; Buchwald P; Lydrup ML
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Feb; 21(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 30411471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer.
Huh JW; Park YA; Sohn SK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17525861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk factors of permanent stomas in patients with rectal cancer after low anterior resection with temporary stomas.
Lee CM; Huh JW; Park YA; Cho YB; Kim HC; Yun SH; Lee WY; Chun HK
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):447-53. PubMed ID: 25683994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients.
Zhang W; Lou Z; Liu Q; Meng R; Gong H; Hao L; Liu P; Sun G; Ma J; Zhang W
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1431-1437. PubMed ID: 28766076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality of Life and Timing of Stoma Closure in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Low Anterior Resection With Diverting Stoma: A Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study.
Herrle F; Sandra-Petrescu F; Weiss C; Post S; Runkel N; Kienle P
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Apr; 59(4):281-90. PubMed ID: 26953986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk factors and inflammatory predictors for Anastomotic Leakage following Total Mesorectal Excision with defunctioning stoma.
Chernyshov S; Alexeev M; Rybakov E; Tarasov M; Shelygin Y; Zarodniuk I; Sukhina M
Pol Przegl Chir; 2018 May; 90(3):31-36. PubMed ID: 30015322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of a diverting ileostomy in total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven AAW; de Jong GM; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):1916-1932. PubMed ID: 36258000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diverting stomas reduce reoperation rates for anastomotic leak but not overall reoperation rates within 30 days after anterior rectal resection: a national cohort study.
Myrseth E; Nymo LS; Gjessing PF; Norderval S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 35739403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Management of Low Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in the Laparoscopic Era: More Than a Decade of Experience.
Boyce SA; Harris C; Stevenson A; Lumley J; Clark D
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Aug; 60(8):807-814. PubMed ID: 28682966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer.
Marusch F; Koch A; Schmidt U; Geibetaler S; Dralle H; Saeger HD; Wolff S; Nestler G; Pross M; Gastinger I; Lippert H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 Sep; 45(9):1164-71. PubMed ID: 12352230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking.
Koperna T
Arch Surg; 2003 Dec; 138(12):1334-8; discussion 1339. PubMed ID: 14662534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
Nurkin S; Kakarla VR; Ruiz DE; Cance WG; Tiszenkel HI
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting the risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Moran BJ
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2010; 57(3):47-50. PubMed ID: 21066983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diverting Stoma
Wang L; Hirano Y; Ishii T; Kondo H; Hara K; Obara N; Tan P; Yamaguchi S
In Vivo; 2019; 33(6):2125-2131. PubMed ID: 31662547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Delayed colo-anal anastomosis is an alternative to prophylactic diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal carcinomas.
Jarry J; Faucheron JL; Moreno W; Bellera CA; Evrard S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21186091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Defunctioning stoma and short- and long-term outcomes after low anterior resection for rectal cancer-a nationwide register-based cohort study.
Gadan S; Brand JS; Rutegård M; Matthiessen P
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1433-1442. PubMed ID: 33728534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer.
Ji WB; Kwak JM; Kim J; Um JW; Kim SH
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(19):5910-7. PubMed ID: 26019455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
