These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2667082)
1. [Palpation and sonography of lymph node metastasis of the neck]. Leicher-Düber A; Thelen M; Bleier R Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2667082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Regional lymph node metastases in malignant tumors of the head and neck: value of diagnostic procedures]. Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Jan; 70(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2025343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Histologically controlled comparison of palpation and sonography in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases]. Eichhorn T; Schroeder HG; Glanz H; Schwerk WB Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 May; 66(5):266-74. PubMed ID: 3302569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Palpation and sonography in after-care of head-neck tumor patients: comparison of ultrasound tumor entity parameters]. Steinkamp HJ; Knöbber D; Schedel H; Mäurer J; Felix R Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Sep; 72(9):431-8. PubMed ID: 8240633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical palpation in evaluating cervical metastasis from head and neck cancer. Hao SP; Ng SH Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Sep; 123(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 10964315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Sonography in cervical lymph node metastases]. Gritzmann N; Czembirek H; Hajek P; Karnel F; Türk R; Frühwald F Radiologe; 1987 Mar; 27(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3295982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A histologically controlled study of the value of sonography and palpation for the detection and exclusion of neck lymph node enlargements and metastases]. Steinkamp HJ; Mathe F; Treisch J; Hosten N; Neumann K; Felix R Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):312-8. PubMed ID: 1821636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The MRI of cervical lymph node metastasis with malignant tumor of the head and neck]. Gu Y; Qiu W; Luo J Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 May; 31(3):137-9. PubMed ID: 9387551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: significance of computerized tomography and palpation. A histologically controlled comparison]. Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe F; Uhrmeister P Rofo; 1991 Oct; 155(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 1932725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck]. Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of palpation, ultrasound and computed tomography in the valuation of lymphatic neck metastasis]. Cinar U; Yiğit O; Topuz E; Akgül G; Unlü M; Başak M; Celebi I; Dadaş B Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 12122634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Krishnamurthy S; Sneige N; Bedi DG; Edieken BS; Fornage BD; Kuerer HM; Singletary SE; Hunt KK Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(5):982-8. PubMed ID: 12209680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography]. Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 2173066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-operative evaluation of cervical adenopathies in tumours of the upper aerodigestive tract. Giancarlo T; Palmieri A; Giacomarra V; Russolo M Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(4B):2805-9. PubMed ID: 9713465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [B-mode sonography of the neck. Comparison of results of sonography, computer tomography and pathomorphology]. Westhofen M; Hagemann J; Schröder S; Herberhold C Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Aug; 64(8):409-17. PubMed ID: 3900610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cervical lymph node metastases. The sonographic demonstration of malignancy]. Steinkamp HJ; Hosten N; Langer R; Mathe F; Ehritt C; Felix R Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 1739771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of a new molecular method for detection of micrometastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Shores CG; Yin X; Funkhouser W; Yarbrough W Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Aug; 130(8):937-42. PubMed ID: 15313863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The node-negative neck: accuracy of clinical intraoperative lymph node assessment for metastatic disease in head and neck cancer. Finn S; Toner M; Timon C Laryngoscope; 2002 Apr; 112(4):630-3. PubMed ID: 12150514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography? Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in cervical lymph node metastasis]. Wang S; Zhang R; Shu J; Lu Z; Zhu C; Chen X; Ge X Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 13(8):352-3. PubMed ID: 12541360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]