These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26671165)

  • 1. A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability.
    Curtis B; Vehmas S
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Jan; 42(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 26671165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Profound Intellectual Disability and the Bestowment View of Moral Status.
    Vehmas S; Curtis B
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2017 Jul; 26(3):505-516. PubMed ID: 28541179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability: a rejoinder to Roberts.
    Curtis B; Vehmas S
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):266-7. PubMed ID: 26964568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas.
    McLachlan HV
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 27125988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
    Reitan E
    Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The moral status of intellectually disabled individuals.
    Edwards SD
    J Med Philos; 1997 Feb; 22(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 9095460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
    Agar N
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Feb; 39(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 22923439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"?
    Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Ethics of Killing: Strengthening the Substance View with Time-relative Interests.
    Blackshaw BP
    New Bioeth; 2019 Dec; 25(4):332-348. PubMed ID: 31596189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The moral status of beings who are not persons: a casuistic argument.
    Wetlesen J
    Environ Values; 1999 Aug; 8(3):287-323. PubMed ID: 15586461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The parenthood argument.
    Simkulet W
    Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preembryo Personhood: an assessment of the President's Council arguments.
    Strong C
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 17043924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The scourge: moral implications of natural embryo loss.
    Ord T
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):12-9. PubMed ID: 18759175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moral agency in other animals.
    Shapiro P
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(4):357-73. PubMed ID: 16906349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermediate Moral Respect and Proportionality Reasoning.
    Finegan T
    Bioethics; 2016 Oct; 30(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 27212688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The moral status of the human embryo: the twinning argument.
    Brogaard B
    Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 16208838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clarifications on the moral status of newborns and the normative implications.
    Giubilini A; Minerva F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):264-5. PubMed ID: 23637424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Engendering moral post-persons: A novel self-help strategy.
    Crutchfield P
    Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):679-686. PubMed ID: 32037579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In defence of newborns: a response to Kingma.
    Colgrove N
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Aug; 48(8):551-553. PubMed ID: 34244343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moral status: what a bad idea!
    Silvers A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2012 Nov; 56(11):1014-25. PubMed ID: 23106746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.