These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26671213)

  • 21. Methodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.
    Lane PW; Higgins JP; Anagnostelis B; Anzures-Cabrera J; Baker NF; Cappelleri JC; Haughie S; Hollis S; Lewis SC; Moneuse P; Whitehead A
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 26053947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses.
    Garcia-Alamino JM; Bankhead C; Heneghan C; Pidduck N; Perera R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015888. PubMed ID: 29122784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study.
    Vale CL; Rydzewska LH; Rovers MM; Emberson JR; Gueyffier F; Stewart LA;
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1088. PubMed ID: 25747860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics.
    Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Michelaki I; Pandis N
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():90-94. PubMed ID: 29738788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Page MJ; Altman DG; McKenzie JE; Shamseer L; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 29203419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions.
    Page MJ; Altman DG; Shamseer L; McKenzie JE; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():8-18. PubMed ID: 29113936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis.
    Davey J; Turner RM; Clarke MJ; Higgins JP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Nov; 11():160. PubMed ID: 22114982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in Oncology Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses Referenced by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines.
    Wayant C; Page MJ; Vassar M
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Nov; 5(11):1550-1555. PubMed ID: 31486837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relevance to meta-analysis, systematic reviews and the cochrane collaboration to clinical psychiatry.
    Tharyan P
    Indian J Psychiatry; 1998 Apr; 40(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 21494461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is grey literature essential for a better control of publication bias in psychiatry? An example from three meta-analyses of schizophrenia.
    Martin JL; Pérez V; Sacristán M; Alvarez E
    Eur Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 20(8):550-3. PubMed ID: 15994063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.
    Kinney AR; Eakman AM; Graham JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 101(12):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 32272106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis.
    IntHout J; Ioannidis JP; Rovers MM; Goeman JJ
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e010247. PubMed ID: 27406637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Empirical evaluation of meta-analytic approaches for nutrient and health outcome dose-response data.
    Yu WW; Schmid CH; Lichtenstein AH; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 25379059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study.
    Petkovic J; Trawin J; Dewidar O; Yoganathan M; Tugwell P; Welch V
    Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 7(1):113. PubMed ID: 30068380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms.
    Qureshi R; Mayo-Wilson E; Rittiphairoj T; McAdams-DeMarco M; Guallar E; Li T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Mar; 143():224-241. PubMed ID: 34742790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ewald H; Klerings I; Wagner G; Heise TL; Dobrescu AI; Armijo-Olivo S; Stratil JM; Lhachimi SK; Mittermayr T; Gartlehner G; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Hemkens LG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Dec; 128():1-12. PubMed ID: 32781114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exploring treatment by covariate interactions using subgroup analysis and meta-regression in cochrane reviews: a review of recent practice.
    Donegan S; Williams L; Dias S; Tudur-Smith C; Welton N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128804. PubMed ID: 26029923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Missing Medians: Exclusion of Ordinal Data from Meta-Analyses.
    Cumming TB; Churilov L; Sena ES
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145580. PubMed ID: 26697876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.