These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26671653)

  • 1. A multilaboratory study on the variability of bovine semen analysis.
    Brito LF
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(2):254-66. PubMed ID: 26671653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: its applicability to andrology laboratories in China].
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 16(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21243747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the Sperm Quality Analyzer.
    Johnston RC; Clarke GN; Liu DY; Baker HW
    Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 7720920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which fields under a coverslip should one assess to estimate sperm motility?
    Nöthling JO; dos Santos IP
    Theriogenology; 2012 May; 77(8):1686-97. PubMed ID: 22341712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
    Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External quality control in the andrology laboratory: an experimental multicenter trial.
    Neuwinger J; Behre HM; Nieschlag E
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Aug; 54(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 2379629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of method and clinician on stallion sperm morphology evaluation.
    Brito LF; Greene LM; Kelleman A; Knobbe M; Turner R
    Theriogenology; 2011 Sep; 76(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 21612814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser.
    Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs M; De Vliegher S; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Smits K; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States.
    Keel BA; Stembridge TW; Pineda G; Serafy NT
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Sep; 78(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 12215340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A
    Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in semen quality in Estonian Holstein AI bulls at 3, 5 and 7 years of age.
    Hallap T; Jaakma U; Rodriguez-Martinez H
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 16689884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the semen analysis results obtained from two branded computer-aided sperm analysis systems.
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Shao Y; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2013 Oct; 45(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 22928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Semen analysis training and its evaluation].
    Lu WH; Gu YQ; Li H; Wang XW; Chen ZW; Liang XW
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Jul; 17(7):601-5. PubMed ID: 21823341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Boar sperm quality in lines of pigs selected for either ovulation rate or uterine capacity.
    Freking BA; Purdy PH; Spiller SF; Welsh CS; Blackburn HD
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Aug; 90(8):2515-23. PubMed ID: 22896731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice.
    Verstegen J; Iguer-Ouada M; Onclin K
    Theriogenology; 2002 Jan; 57(1):149-79. PubMed ID: 11775967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Successful preservation of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) semen in liquid and frozen states.
    Kowalczyk A; Łukaszewicz E; Rzońca Z
    Theriogenology; 2012 Mar; 77(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 22192393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the conventional criteria of semen quality by computer-assisted image analysis: evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyser in the context of a service andrology laboratory.
    Macleod IC; Irvine DS; Masterton A; Taylor A; Templeton AA
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Feb; 9(2):310-9. PubMed ID: 8027288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.