These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26671893)
1. Validity and Representative Data of the MRCI With Legally Involved Juveniles. Rogers R; Sharf AJ; Carter RM; Henry SL; Williams MM; Robinson EV Assessment; 2017 Jul; 24(5):591-602. PubMed ID: 26671893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating juvenile detainees' Miranda misconceptions: The discriminant validity of the Juvenile Miranda Quiz. Sharf AJ; Rogers R; Williams MM; Drogin EY Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):556-567. PubMed ID: 27504907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mired in Miranda misconceptions: a study of legally involved juveniles at different levels of psychosocial maturity. Rogers R; Steadham JA; Fiduccia CE; Drogin EY; Robinson EV Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(1):104-20. PubMed ID: 24510839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Examination of Juveniles' Miranda Abilities: Investigating Differences in Miranda Recall and Reasoning. Rogers R; Steadham JA; Carter RM; Henry SA; Drogin EY; Robinson EV Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jul; 34(4):515-38. PubMed ID: 27296519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The MRCI with juvenile detainees: optimizing performance or emphasizing ecological validity? Rogers R; Sharf AJ; Carter RM; Winningham DB; Sternad RN Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29460439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Miranda rights comprehension instruments: a critical review. Frumkin IB; Sellbom M Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):545-54. PubMed ID: 23486908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychometric properties of the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments with a juvenile justice sample. Goldstein NE; Romaine CL; Zelle H; Kalbeitzer R; Mesiarik C; Wolbransky M Assessment; 2011 Dec; 18(4):428-41. PubMed ID: 21393317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Juvenile offenders' Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions. Goldstein NE; Condie LO; Kalbeitzer R; Osman D; Geier JL Assessment; 2003 Dec; 10(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 14682482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating Miranda waiver decisions: An examination of the rational consequences. Blackwood HL; Rogers R; Steadham JA; Fiduccia CE Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():11-8. PubMed ID: 26386618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Juveniles' Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors. Zelle H; Romaine CL; Goldstein NE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 25495714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Missing out on Miranda: Investigating Miranda comprehension and waiver decisions in adult inpatients. Winningham DB; Rogers R; Drogin EY; Velsor SF Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():81-89. PubMed ID: 30262174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Grisso tests for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda warnings with a forensic sample. Frumkin IB; Lally SJ; Sexton JE Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):673-92. PubMed ID: 22736529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and initial validation of the Miranda vocabulary scale. Rogers R; Hazelwood LL; Sewell KW; Blackwood HL; Rogstad JE; Harrison KS Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):381-92. PubMed ID: 18953641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dodging Self-Incriminations: An Examination of Feigned Miranda Abilities on the SAMA. Rogers R; Henry SA; Sharf AJ; Robinson EV; Williams MM Assessment; 2017 Dec; 24(8):975-986. PubMed ID: 26939800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: a comparison of legal standards. Viljoen JL; Zapf PA; Roesch R Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 17285585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluations of capacity to waive Miranda rights: a survey of practitioners' use of the Grisso instruments. Ryba NL; Brodsky SL; Shlosberg A Assessment; 2007 Sep; 14(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 17690385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The detrimental impact of alcohol intoxication on facets of Miranda comprehension. Mindthoff A; Evans JR; Wolfs ACF; Polanco K; Goldstein NES; Schreiber Compo N Law Hum Behav; 2022 Aug; 46(4):264-276. PubMed ID: 35878105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of implied Miranda waivers and Powell wording in a mock-crime study. Gillard ND; Rogers R; Kelsey KR; Robinson EV Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 24933168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical review of published competency-to-confess measures. Rogers R; Jordan MJ; Harrison KS Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):707-18; discussion 719-24. PubMed ID: 15732654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents. McLachlan K; Roesch R; Douglas KS Law Hum Behav; 2011 Jun; 35(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 20127277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]