448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26672517)
1. Crop conundrum.
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):307-8. PubMed ID: 26672517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Gene-editing surges as US rethinks regulations.
Ledford H
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):158-9. PubMed ID: 27075074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Breeding controls.
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):147. PubMed ID: 27075058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Europe's genetically edited plants stuck in legal limbo.
Abbott A
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):319-20. PubMed ID: 26672535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union.
Callaway E
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7716):16. PubMed ID: 30065322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Separate product from process: framing the debate that surrounds the potential uptake of new breeding technologies.
Parry G; Jose S
Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29220093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.
Biswas S; Zhang D; Shi J
Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jun; 40(6):979-998. PubMed ID: 33977326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene editing: Edited plants should not be patented.
Porter JR; Durand JL; Elmayan T
Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7588):33. PubMed ID: 26842045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.
Strauss SH; Sax JK
Nat Biotechnol; 2016 May; 34(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 27153272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation.
Waltz E
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):293. PubMed ID: 27111611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Agriculture: A new breed of edits.
Ainsworth C
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7580):S15-6. PubMed ID: 26630594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding.
Hua K; Zhang J; Botella JR; Ma C; Kong F; Liu B; Zhu JK
Mol Plant; 2019 Aug; 12(8):1047-1059. PubMed ID: 31260812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CRISPR conundrum: Strict European court ruling leaves food-testing labs without a plan.
Ledford H
Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7767):15. PubMed ID: 31363192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
Whelan AI; Lema MA
GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactive database of genome editing applications in crops and future policy making in the European Union.
Dima O; Heyvaert Y; Inzé D
Trends Plant Sci; 2022 Aug; 27(8):746-748. PubMed ID: 35599136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strict EU ruling on gene-edited crops squeezes science.
Wight AJ
Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):15-16. PubMed ID: 30377319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
Georges F; Ray H
GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. European Union moves to curb moratorium on transgenic plants.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):967-8. PubMed ID: 11234031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PLANTS IN THE CRISPR.
Webb S
Biotechniques; 2017 Sep; 63(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 28911311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Scope and Definitions.
Eriksson D; Custers R; Edvardsson Björnberg K; Hansson SO; Purnhagen K; Qaim M; Romeis J; Schiemann J; Schleissing S; Tosun J; Visser RGF
Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):231-234. PubMed ID: 32059122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
