These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26672535)

  • 1. Europe's genetically edited plants stuck in legal limbo.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):319-20. PubMed ID: 26672535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crop conundrum.
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):307-8. PubMed ID: 26672517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene editing: Edited plants should not be patented.
    Porter JR; Durand JL; Elmayan T
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7588):33. PubMed ID: 26842045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.
    Strauss SH; Sax JK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 May; 34(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 27153272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breeding controls.
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):147. PubMed ID: 27075058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene-editing surges as US rethinks regulations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):158-9. PubMed ID: 27075074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation.
    Waltz E
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):293. PubMed ID: 27111611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Europe's first and last field trial of gene-edited plants?
    Faure JD; Napier JA
    Elife; 2018 Dec; 7():. PubMed ID: 30558714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Europe should rethink its stance on GM crops.
    Heap B
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7455):409. PubMed ID: 23803807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms.
    Conko G; Kershen DL; Miller H; Parrott WA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 May; 34(5):493-503. PubMed ID: 27153279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strict EU ruling on gene-edited crops squeezes science.
    Wight AJ
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):15-16. PubMed ID: 30377319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Jun; 2(6):670. PubMed ID: 17570700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BIOTECHNOLOGY. Europe's rifts over transgenic crops deepen at key deadline.
    Rabesandratana T
    Science; 2015 Oct; 350(6256):18-9. PubMed ID: 26430094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
    Kuzma J
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):165-7. PubMed ID: 26961641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene editing in legal limbo in Europe.
    Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7642):392. PubMed ID: 28230148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CRISPR conundrum: Strict European court ruling leaves food-testing labs without a plan.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7767):15. PubMed ID: 31363192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EC struggles to unravel regulations.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 10888826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits.
    Krueger R; Le Buanec B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EU proposal on CRISPR-edited crops is welcome - but not enough.
    Mehta D
    Nature; 2023 Jul; 619(7970):437. PubMed ID: 37464084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.