387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26673129)
1. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults.
Sasaki JE; Hickey AM; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Kent JA; Freedson PS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers.
Ahmadi MN; Brookes D; Chowdhury A; Pavey T; Trost SG
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 May; 52(5):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 31764460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning Models for Classifying Physical Activity in Free-Living Preschool Children.
Ahmadi MN; Pavey TG; Trost SG
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32764316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intermonitor reliability of the GT3X+ accelerometer at hip, wrist and ankle sites during activities of daily living.
Ozemek C; Kirschner MM; Wilkerson BS; Byun W; Kaminsky LA
Physiol Meas; 2014 Feb; 35(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 24399138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ngram time series model to predict activity type and energy cost from wrist, hip and ankle accelerometers: implications of age.
Strath SJ; Kate RJ; Keenan KG; Welch WA; Swartz AM
Physiol Meas; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2335-51. PubMed ID: 26449155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle.
Mannini A; Intille SS; Rosenberger M; Sabatini AM; Haskell W
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Nov; 45(11):2193-203. PubMed ID: 23604069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning algorithms for activity recognition in ambulant children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Ahmadi M; O'Neil M; Fragala-Pinkham M; Lennon N; Trost S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 15(1):105. PubMed ID: 30442154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability of measured acceleration from accelerometry-based activity monitors.
Rowlands AV; Fraysse F; Catt M; Stiles VH; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Olds TS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):201-10. PubMed ID: 24870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of sampling rate on acceleration and counts of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in children.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Brønd J; Arvidsson D; Montoye AHK
Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(9):095008. PubMed ID: 31518999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective Assessment of Physical Activity: Classifiers for Public Health.
Kerr J; Patterson RE; Ellis K; Godbole S; Johnson E; Lanckriet G; Staudenmayer J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 27089222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning for activity recognition: hip versus wrist data.
Trost SG; Zheng Y; Wong WK
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2183-9. PubMed ID: 25340887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.
Hildebrand M; Hansen BH; van Hees VT; Ekelund U
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 27878845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
