BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2667369)

  • 1. Clinical indications for and procedures associated with penetrating keratoplasty, 1983-1988.
    Brady SE; Rapuano CJ; Arentsen JJ; Cohen EJ; Laibson PR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 108(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 2667369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty: 1980-1988.
    Lindquist TD; McGlothan JS; Rotkis WM; Chandler JW
    Cornea; 1991 May; 10(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 2055026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Haamann P; Jensen OM; Schmidt P
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Aug; 72(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 7825409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penetrating keratoplasty: changing indications, 1947 to 1978.
    Smith RE; McDonald HR; Nesburn AB; Minckler DS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Jul; 98(7):1226-9. PubMed ID: 6994703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Penetrating keratoplasty 1981-1988: clinical indications and pathologic findings.
    Mamalis N; Craig MT; Coulter VL; Lundergan MK; Olson RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1991 Mar; 17(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 2040973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graft survival in four common groups of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty.
    Price FW; Whitson WE; Marks RG
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Mar; 98(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 2023753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Mamalis N; Anderson CW; Kreisler KR; Lundergan MK; Olson RJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Oct; 110(10):1409-11. PubMed ID: 1417539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1989-1995.
    Lois N; Kowal VO; Cohen EJ; Rapuano CJ; Gault JA; Raber IM; Laibson PR
    Cornea; 1997 Nov; 16(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 9395870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Pseudophakic keratoplasty].
    Freyler H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Feb; 188(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 3520118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changing Trends in Penetrating Keratoplasty Indications between 2011 and 2018 - Histopathology of 2123 Corneal Buttons in a Single Center in Germany.
    Pluzsik MT; Seitz B; Flockerzi FA; Langenbucher A; Tóth G; Bohle RM; Szentmáry N
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Oct; 45(10):1199-1204. PubMed ID: 32114836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An update of the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. 1979 through 1983.
    Robin JB; Gindi JJ; Koh K; Schanzlin DJ; Rao NA; York KK; Smith RE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Jan; 104(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 3510613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolving indications for and trends in keratoplasty in British Columbia, Canada, from 2002 to 2011: a 10-year review.
    Tan JC; Holland SP; Dubord PJ; Moloney G; McCarthy M; Yeung SN
    Cornea; 2014 Mar; 33(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 24457452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Taiwan from 1987 to 1999.
    Chen WL; Hu FR; Wang IJ
    Cornea; 2001 Mar; 20(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 11248815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soemmering's ring support for posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation during penetrating keratoplasty. Changing trends in bullous keratopathy.
    Donnenfeld ED; Ingraham HJ; Perry HD; Russell S; Foulks G
    Ophthalmology; 1992 Aug; 99(8):1229-33. PubMed ID: 1513575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Keratoplasty of pseudophakic eyes with posterior chamber lenses in Fuchs' dystrophy and secondary bullous keratopathy. Long-term outcome].
    Müller M; Meyer HJ; Meyer C
    Ophthalmologe; 1997 Apr; 94(4):282-4. PubMed ID: 9229497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results after penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.
    Pineros O; Cohen EJ; Rapuano CJ; Laibson PR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 114(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 8540845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States.
    Dobbins KR; Price FW; Whitson WE
    Cornea; 2000 Nov; 19(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 11095055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential Survival of Penetrating and Lamellar Transplants in Management of Failed Corneal Grafts.
    Aboshiha J; Jones MNA; Hopkinson CL; Larkin DFP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 136(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 29931227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Post operation complications analysis and their treatment of Descemet's stripping automated endothelium keratoplasty].
    Hong J; Peng R; Hao Y; Qu H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 50(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 24931150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progression of visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Price FW; Whitson WE; Marks RG
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Aug; 98(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 1923353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.