These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26674128)

  • 61. Remembering can cause inhibition: retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process.
    Veling H; van Knippenberg A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 14979806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Planning Education for Long-Term Retention: The Cognitive Science and Implementation of Retrieval Practice.
    Larsen DP
    Semin Neurol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):449-456. PubMed ID: 30125899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Balota DA; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1559-1572. PubMed ID: 26950490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Criterial learning is not enough: Retrieval practice is necessary for improving post-stress memory accessibility.
    Smith AM; Davis FC; Thomas AK
    Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 132(3):161-170. PubMed ID: 29809044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The spacing effect in immediate and delayed free recall.
    Godbole NR; Delaney PF; Verkoeijen PP
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 23701389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.
    Lipowski SL; Pyc MA; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Apr; 50(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 24294884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: another test effect.
    Bjork EL; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 21574746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
    Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge.
    Cantor AD; Eslick AN; Marsh EJ; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25201690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparing the effects of testing and restudying on recollection in recognition memory.
    Verkoeijen PP; Tabbers HK; Verhage ML
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 21768063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Long-term spacing effect benefits in developmental amnesia: case experiments in rehabilitation.
    Green JL; Weston T; Wiseheart M; Rosenbaum RS
    Neuropsychology; 2014 Sep; 28(5):685-94. PubMed ID: 24749729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration.
    Lehman M; Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1787-94. PubMed ID: 24797442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Test expectancy and memory for important information.
    Middlebrooks CD; Murayama K; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):972-985. PubMed ID: 28095010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults.
    Tse CS; Balota DA; Roediger HL
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):833-45. PubMed ID: 20718541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.
    Congleton A; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):528-39. PubMed ID: 22160872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning.
    van den Broek GS; Takashima A; Segers E; Fernández G; Verhoeven L
    Neuroimage; 2013 Sep; 78():94-102. PubMed ID: 23578576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The spacing effect stands up to big data.
    Kim ASN; Wong-Kee-You AMB; Wiseheart M; Rosenbaum RS
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 30623389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
    Oberauer K; Meyer N
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.