307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26674145)
1. Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Barčaitė E; Kemeklienė G; Railaitė DR; Bartusevičius A; Maleckienė L; Nadišauskienė R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2015 Nov; 51(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 26674145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.
Nakamura-Pereira M; do Carmo Leal M; Esteves-Pereira AP; Domingues RM; Torres JA; Dias MA; Moreira ME
Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):128. PubMed ID: 27766941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.
Pinto P; Crispín-Milart PH; Rojo E; Adiego B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():308-314. PubMed ID: 33039839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania's experience.
Kacerauskiene J; Bartuseviciene E; Railaite DR; Minkauskiene M; Bartusevicius A; Kliucinskas M; Simoliuniene R; Nadisauskiene RJ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):432. PubMed ID: 29262810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.
Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.
Savchenko J; Ladfors L; Hjertberg L; Hildebrand E; Brismar Wendel S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jul; 101(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 35292960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingan D; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 25371294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.
Akadri AA; Imaralu JO; Salami OF; Nwankpa CC; Adepoju AA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Apr; 23(1):243. PubMed ID: 37046219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.
Chong C; Su LL; Biswas A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 22897799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple pregnancy is the leading contributor to cesarean sections in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: An analysis using the Robson 10-group classification system.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingam D; Yu SL; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1141-5. PubMed ID: 27251069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital.
Amatya A; Paudel R; Poudyal A; Wagle RR; Singh M; Thapa S
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):255-8. PubMed ID: 24908526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.
Cammu H; Martens E; Van Maele G
J Pregnancy; 2020; 2020():2793296. PubMed ID: 33274077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of cesarean categories in a modified Robson classification in a single center from 2002 to 2012 due to high rate of maternal pathology.
Jayot A; Nizard J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jun; 42(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 27062530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new way of looking at Caesarean section births.
McCarthy FP; Rigg L; Cady L; Cullinane F
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 47(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 17627688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain.
Vila-Candel R; Martín A; Escuriet R; Castro-Sánchez E; Soriano-Vidal FJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 32121364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
Abubeker FA; Gashawbeza B; Gebre TM; Wondafrash M; Teklu AM; Degu D; Bekele D
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):767. PubMed ID: 33298012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.
Kelly S; Sprague A; Fell DB; Murphy P; Aelicks N; Guo Y; Fahey J; Lauzon L; Scott H; Lee L; Kinniburgh B; Prince M; Walker M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 23470108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.
Ferreira EC; Pacagnella RC; Costa ML; Cecatti JG
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 25704253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
