744 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26674305)
21. Factors predicting prostate cancer upgrading on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in an active surveillance population.
Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Thomas JV; Nix JW; Rais-Bahrami S
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(11):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 28140460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Cooperberg MR; Chan JM; Zhao S; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 30179620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.
Numao N; Yoshida S; Komai Y; Ishii C; Kagawa M; Kijima T; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 23473904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Nassiri N; Margolis DJ; Natarajan S; Sharma DS; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):632-639. PubMed ID: 27639713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings in men with low-risk prostate cancer followed using active surveillance.
Mullins JK; Bonekamp D; Landis P; Begum H; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Carter HB; Macura KJ
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1037-45. PubMed ID: 23464904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Bloom JB; Hale GR; Gold SA; Rayn KN; Smith C; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Parnes HL; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 30577395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. External Validation and Comparison of Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators Incorporating Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Saba K; Wettstein MS; Lieger L; Hötker AM; Donati OF; Moch H; Ankerst DP; Poyet C; Sulser T; Eberli D; Mortezavi A
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):719-726. PubMed ID: 31651228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance.
Ma TM; Tosoian JJ; Schaeffer EM; Landis P; Wolf S; Macura KJ; Epstein JI; Mamawala M; Carter HB
Eur Urol; 2017 Feb; 71(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 27236496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.
Garcia-Reyes K; Nguyen HG; Zagoria RJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Behr SC; Westphalen AC
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 28941918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.
Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Turkbey B; Stamatakis L; Logan J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Vourganti S; Truong H; Kruecker J; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 23727310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol.
Lee DH; Koo KC; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 43(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 23580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Walton Diaz A; Shakir NA; George AK; Rais-Bahrami S; Turkbey B; Rothwax JT; Stamatakis L; Hong CW; Siddiqui MM; Okoro C; Raskolnikov D; Su D; Shih J; Han H; Parnes HL; Merino MJ; Simon RM; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2015 May; 33(5):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 25754621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Voss J; Pal R; Ahmed S; Hannah M; Jaulim A; Walton T
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):863-870. PubMed ID: 29239082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
