339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26674777)
1. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500.
Akman A; Asena L; Güngör SG
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 100(9):1201-5. PubMed ID: 26674777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.
Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates With Biometers Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared to Partial-Coherence Interferometry and Optical Low-Coherence Interferometry.
McAlinden C; Wang Q; Gao R; Zhao W; Yu A; Li Y; Guo Y; Huang J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 173():64-69. PubMed ID: 27664702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Keratometry Obtained by a Swept Source OCT-Based Biometer with a Standard Optical Biometer and Scheimpflug Imaging.
Asena L; Akman A; Güngör SG; Dursun Altınörs D
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):882-888. PubMed ID: 29630418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.
Chan TCY; Wan KH; Tang FY; Wang YM; Yu M; Cheung C
Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry.
Huang J; Chen H; Li Y; Chen Z; Gao R; Yu J; Zhao Y; Lu W; McAlinden C; Wang Q
J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 30742226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and iol power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):859-865. PubMed ID: 27793471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG
Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.
Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
