242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26675313)
1. A radiobiology-based inverse treatment planning method for optimisation of permanent l-125 prostate implants in focal brachytherapy.
Haworth A; Mears C; Betts JM; Reynolds HM; Tack G; Leo K; Williams S; Ebert MA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(1):430-44. PubMed ID: 26675313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inverse automated treatment planning with and without individual optimization in interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy with high- and low-activity 125I.
Pinkawa M; Maurer U; Mulhern A; Gagel B; Block T; Borchers H; Grieger J; Henkel T; Eble M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Jun; 179(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 12789469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy.
Butler WM; Merrick GS; Lief JH; Dorsey AT
Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 10718143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Monte Carlo study of I-125 prostate brachytherapy with gold nanoparticles: dose enhancement with simultaneous rectal dose sparing via radiation shielding.
Brivio D; Nguyen PL; Sajo E; Ngwa W; Zygmanski P
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1935-1948. PubMed ID: 28140338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving toward focal therapy in prostate cancer: dual-isotope permanent seed implants as a possible solution.
Todor DA; Barani IJ; Lin PS; Anscher MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 21536392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging.
Zaider M; Zelefsky MJ; Lee EK; Zakian KL; Amols HI; Dyke J; Cohen G; Hu Y; Endi AK; Chui C; Koutcher JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(4):1085-96. PubMed ID: 10863082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Permanent implant prostate cancer brachytherapy: 2013 state-of-the art].
Cosset JM; Hannoun-Lévi JM; Peiffert D; Delannes M; Pommier P; Pierrat N; Nickers P; Thomas L; Chauveinc L
Cancer Radiother; 2013 Apr; 17(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 23478488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy, high-dose rate brachytherapy, and low-dose rate permanent seeds implant for localized prostate cancer.
Yang R; Zhao N; Liao A; Wang H; Qu A
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 27400663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants.
Chibani O; Williamson JF; Todor D
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2557-66. PubMed ID: 16193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry modeling for focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Mason J; Al-Qaisieh B; Bownes P; Thwaites D; Henry A
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 25085456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isotope selection for permanent prostate implants? An evaluation of 103Pd versus 125I based on radiobiological effectiveness and dosimetry.
Dicker AP; Lin CC; Leeper DB; Waterman FM
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 May; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 10875458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between isotope half-life and prostatic edema for optimal prostate dose coverage in permanent seed implants.
Villeneuve M; Leclerc G; Lessard E; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1970-7. PubMed ID: 18561673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prescription dose in permanent (131)Cs seed prostate implants.
Yue N; Heron DE; Komanduri K; Huq MS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2496-502. PubMed ID: 16193779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric considerations to determine the optimal technique for localized prostate cancer among external photon, proton, or carbon-ion therapy and high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Georg D; Hopfgartner J; Gòra J; Kuess P; Kragl G; Berger D; Hegazy N; Goldner G; Georg P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 24521685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of interactive planned and dynamic dose calculated prostate seed brachytherapy.
Meijer GJ; van den Berg HA; Hurkmans CW; Stijns PE; Weterings JH
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 16930753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiobiological parameters in a tumour control probability model for prostate cancer LDR brachytherapy.
Her EJ; Reynolds HM; Mears C; Williams S; Moorehouse C; Millar JL; Ebert MA; Haworth A
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jun; 63(13):135011. PubMed ID: 29799812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
