These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 266755)

  • 21. The manipulation of restorative dental materials.
    Nuckles DB
    Dent Assist (1931); 1972 Jan; 41(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 4500129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study.
    Mannocci F; Ferrari M; Watson TF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 11264937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biological evaluation of dental restorative materials--a comparison of different test methods.
    Wennberg A; Mjör IA; Hensten-Pettersen A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Jan; 17(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 6826576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biological testing of dental restorative materials in vitro--a review.
    Browne RM; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1979 Oct; 6(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 291706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporary zinc oxide-eugenol cement: eugenol quantity in dentin and bond strength of resin composite.
    Koch T; Peutzfeldt A; Malinovskii V; Flury S; Häner R; Lussi A
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Aug; 121(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 23841789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal.
    Cox CF; Sübay RK; Suzuki S; Suzuki SH; Ostro E
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 9084310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity of different human cell line in the biologic evaluation of dental resin-based restorative materials.
    Hensten-Pettersen A; Helgeland K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1981 Feb; 89(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 6940222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dental cements, direct filling resins, composite and adhesive restorative materials: a resume.
    Paffenbarger GC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1972; 6(1):363-93. PubMed ID: 4552400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of dental cement durability.
    Richter WA; Ueno H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Mar; 33(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 1089785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.
    Marvin JC; Gallegos SI; Parsaei S; Rodrigues DC
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e705-e712. PubMed ID: 29522263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro assessment of cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials on WEHI 13 var fibroblasts.
    Bakopoulou AA; Triviai IN; Tsiftsoglou AS; Garefis PD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 16479751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biological evaluation on glass ionomer cement.
    Kawahara H; Imanishi Y; Oshima H
    J Dent Res; 1979 Mar; 58(3):1080-6. PubMed ID: 106077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A suitable base material for composite resin restorations: zinc oxide eugenol.
    He LH; Purton DG; Swain MV
    J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 19961894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methods of assessment in vitro of restorative material cytotoxicity using an intact human dentine diffusion step.
    Hume WR
    Int Endod J; 1988 Mar; 21(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 3268558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of Kri 1 paste and zinc oxide-eugenol used in primary tooth pulpectomies.
    Wright KJ; Barbosa SV; Araki K; Spångberg LS
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 8015949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of dentine on the in vitro cytotoxicity testing of dental restorative materials.
    Meryon SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Sep; 18(7):771-9. PubMed ID: 6544777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. pH and the cytotoxicity of fluoride in an animal cell culture system.
    Helgeland K; Leirskar J
    Scand J Dent Res; 1976 Jan; 84(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 2967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological tests of a silicophosphate cement.
    Dahl BL; Tronstad L; Spånberg L
    J Oral Rehabil; 1975 Jul; 2(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 807693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo measurements of thermal diffusion through restorations of various materials.
    Harper RH; Schnell RJ; Swartz ML; Phillips RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Feb; 43(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 6928029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.