1146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26675564)
1. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is early antithrombotic therapy necessary in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves in normal sinus rhythm?
ElBardissi AW; DiBardino DJ; Chen FY; Yamashita MH; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 20303508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choice of Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Rapidly Aging and Long-Living Society.
Sakamoto Y; Yoshitake M; Matsumura Y; Naruse H; Bando K; Hashimoto K
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(6):333-339. PubMed ID: 27616041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twenty-year outcome of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical mechanical valves in Japanese patients.
Minakata K; Tanaka S; Okawa Y; Kaneko T; Okonogi S; Usui A; Abe T; Tamura N; Yanagi S; Sakata R
Circ J; 2015; 79(11):2380-8. PubMed ID: 26346033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early Antithrombotic Therapy after Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Experience.
Lee SI; Lee KS; Kim JB; Choo SJ; Chung CH; Lee JW; Jung SH
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 23(3):128-134. PubMed ID: 28367855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-term results of aortic root replacement using a self-assembled biological composite graft.
Meszaros K; Liniger S; Czerny M; Stanger O; Reineke D; Englberger L; Carrel TP
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 19(4):584-9. PubMed ID: 24994702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis.
Attia T; Yang Y; Svensson LG; Toth AJ; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Johnston DR;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Nov; 164(5):1444-1455.e4. PubMed ID: 33892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of warfarin on cardiac and cerebrovascular events following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A nationwide cohort study.
Chang WT; Ho CH; Chang CL; Cheng BC; Wu NC; Chen ZC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 May; 159(5):1730-1739.e1. PubMed ID: 31208804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological substitutes: a 20 years cohort.
Ribeiro AH; Wender OC; de Almeida AS; Soares LE; Picon PD
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2014 Oct; 14():146. PubMed ID: 25326757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the On-X mechanical prosthesis on intermediate-term major thromboembolism and hemorrhage: a prospective multicenter study.
Chan V; Jamieson WR; Lam BK; Ruel M; Ling H; Fradet G; Mesana TG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 140(5):1053-8.e2. PubMed ID: 20546795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
