These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26675584)

  • 1. Social density processes regulate the functioning and performance of foraging human teams.
    King AJ; Myatt JP; Fürtbauer I; Oesch N; Dunbar RI; Sumner S; Usherwood JR; Hailes S; Brown MR
    Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():18260. PubMed ID: 26675584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collective learning from individual experiences and information transfer during group foraging.
    Falcón-Cortés A; Boyer D; Ramos-Fernández G
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Feb; 16(151):20180803. PubMed ID: 30958179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sports teams as superorganisms: implications of sociobiological models of behaviour for research and practice in team sports performance analysis.
    Duarte R; Araújo D; Correia V; Davids K
    Sports Med; 2012 Aug; 42(8):633-42. PubMed ID: 22715927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants and outcomes of decision-making, group coordination and social interactions during a foraging experiment in a wild primate.
    Pyritz LW; Fichtel C; Huchard E; Kappeler PM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53144. PubMed ID: 23326392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tacit coordination in social dilemmas: the importance of having a common understanding.
    van Dijk E; de Kwaadsteniet EW; De Cremer D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):665-78. PubMed ID: 19254111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying robustness in the regulation of collective foraging of ant colonies using an interaction-based model with backward bifurcation.
    Udiani O; Pinter-Wollman N; Kang Y
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 367():61-75. PubMed ID: 25484006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual social information use in collective foraging.
    Mezey D; Deffner D; Kurvers RHJM; Romanczuk P
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1012087. PubMed ID: 38701082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collective behavior.
    Goldstone RL; Gureckis TM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2009 Jul; 1(3):412-38. PubMed ID: 25164995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance.
    Lehmann-Willenbrock N; Allen JA
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Nov; 99(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 25314363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems.
    Passos P; Davids K; Araújo D; Paz N; Minguéns J; Mendes J
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Mar; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 21145787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anger and retribution after collective overuse: the role of blaming and environmental uncertainty in social dilemmas.
    de Kwaadsteniet EW; van Dijk E; Wit A; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jan; 36(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 20019385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cluster phase analysis for collective behavior in team sports.
    López-Felip MA; Davis TJ; Frank TD; Dixon JA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Jun; 59():96-111. PubMed ID: 29627663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foraging in groups affects giving-up densities: solo foragers quit sooner.
    Carthey AJ; Banks PB
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 25740332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis.
    Courtright SH; Thurgood GR; Stewart GL; Pierotti AJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1825-46. PubMed ID: 25938722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligent decisions from the hive mind: foragers and nectar receivers of Apis mellifera collaborate to optimise active forager numbers.
    Edwards JR; Myerscough MR
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Feb; 271(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 21126525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group performance and decision making.
    Kerr NL; Tindale RS
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2004; 55():623-55. PubMed ID: 14744229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collective benefit in joint perceptual judgments: Partial roles of shared environments, meta-cognition, and feedback.
    Voinov PV; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():116-130. PubMed ID: 30953823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reading people's minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making.
    de Melo CM; Carnevale PJ; Read SJ; Gratch J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jan; 106(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 24079297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating Conversational Dynamics: Interactive Alignment, Interpersonal Synergy, and Collective Task Performance.
    Fusaroli R; Tylén K
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 40(1):145-71. PubMed ID: 25988263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Innovation in globally distributed teams: the role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions.
    Gajendran RS; Joshi A
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Nov; 97(6):1252-61. PubMed ID: 22708920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.