338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26676235)
1. Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
Mittmann N; Stout NK; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Yaffe MJ
Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):16-25. PubMed ID: 26676235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women.
Tina Shih YC; Dong W; Xu Y; Shen Y
Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30711063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of the Norwegian breast cancer screening program.
van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2017 Feb; 140(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 27861849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.
Yaffe MJ; Mittmann N; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Stout NK
Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):9-15. PubMed ID: 26676234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines.
Ahern CH; Shen Y
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):718-25. PubMed ID: 19258473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation for breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Allaire BT; Ekweme D; Hoerger TJ; DeGroff A; Rim SH; Subramanian S; Miller JW
Cancer Causes Control; 2019 Sep; 30(9):923-929. PubMed ID: 31297693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insights Into Breast Cancer Screening: A Computer Simulation of Two Contemporary Screening Strategies.
Carter KJ; Castro F; Morcos RN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):564-571. PubMed ID: 29323554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.
de Gelder R; Bulliard JL; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; Schopper D; de Koning HJ
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 19038540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
