These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26677480)

  • 1. Adequate number of clinicians on usability tests lacking, says study.
    ED Manag; 2015 Dec; 27(12):137-41. PubMed ID: 26677480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.
    Ratwani RM; Zachary Hettinger A; Kosydar A; Fairbanks RJ; Hodgkins ML
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e35-e39. PubMed ID: 27375292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.
    Ratwani RM; Hettinger AZ; Fairbanks RJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e191-e193. PubMed ID: 27572813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a cognitive framework of patient record summary review in the formative phase of user-centered design.
    Horsky J; Ramelson HZ
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():147-157. PubMed ID: 27725292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.
    Russ AL; Saleem JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():123-133. PubMed ID: 29329702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vendors provide advice on EMR usability.
    ED Manag; 2016 Apr; 28(4):44-7. PubMed ID: 27093768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advancing electronic health record vendor usability maturity: Progress and next steps.
    Hettinger AZ; Melnick ER; Ratwani RM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Apr; 28(5):1029-1031. PubMed ID: 33517394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.
    Zahabi M; Kaber DB; Swangnetr M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):805-34. PubMed ID: 25850118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving toward a sociotechnical systems approach to continuous health information technology design: the path forward for improving electronic health record usability and reducing clinician burnout.
    Carayon P; Salwei ME
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Apr; 28(5):1026-1028. PubMed ID: 33537756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-vendor evaluation of key user-defined clinical decision support capabilities: a scenario-based assessment of certified electronic health records with guidelines for future development.
    McCoy AB; Wright A; Sittig DF
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Sep; 22(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 26104739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.
    Farzandipour M; Meidani Z; Riazi H; Sadeqi Jabali M
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2018 Sep; 43(3):280-299. PubMed ID: 28398097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Got people? With HITECH deadlines looming, CIOs need to ramp up staffing if they are to achieve meaningful use certification.
    Hagland M
    Healthc Inform; 2009 Dec; 26(12):36-7, 39-40, 42. PubMed ID: 20052884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of usability problems of electronic medical record systems in the emergency department.
    Shin GW; Lee Y; Park T; Cho I; Yun MH; Bahn S; Lee JH
    Work; 2022; 72(1):221-238. PubMed ID: 34120924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Permanent certification program for health information technology; revisions to ONC-Approved Accreditor processes. Final rule.
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services
    Fed Regist; 2011 Nov; 76(227):72636-43. PubMed ID: 22141187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. End-Users' Voice in EHR Selection: Development of a Usability Questionnaire for Demonstrations in Procurement (DPUQ).
    Tyllinen M; Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Nieminen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():346-351. PubMed ID: 28186066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top vendors of enterprise EMR systems: based on total number of installations at acute-care hospitals from October 2011 to October 2012.
    Mod Healthc; 2012 Dec; Suppl():30. PubMed ID: 23323373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic Health Record Vendor Adherence to Usability Certification Requirements and Testing Standards.
    Ratwani RM; Benda NC; Hettinger AZ; Fairbanks RJ
    JAMA; 2015 Sep; 314(10):1070-1. PubMed ID: 26348757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better Bridges, Better Systems.
    Berlin J
    Tex Med; 2015 Sep; 111(9):39-43. PubMed ID: 26360338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ONC Health IT Certification Program: Enhanced Oversight and Accountability. Final rule.
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Department of Health and Human Services
    Fed Regist; 2016 Oct; 81(202):72404-71. PubMed ID: 27901561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.