128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26678073)
21. Accurate genome relative abundance estimation based on shotgun metagenomic reads.
Xia LC; Cram JA; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27992. PubMed ID: 22162995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. De novo haplotype reconstruction in viral quasispecies using paired-end read guided path finding.
Chen J; Zhao Y; Sun Y
Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):2927-2935. PubMed ID: 29617936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Full-length de novo viral quasispecies assembly through variation graph construction.
Baaijens JA; Van der Roest B; Köster J; Stougie L; Schönhuth A
Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5086-5094. PubMed ID: 31147688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets.
Portik DM; Brown CT; Pierce-Ward NT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):541. PubMed ID: 36513983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CLARK: fast and accurate classification of metagenomic and genomic sequences using discriminative k-mers.
Ounit R; Wanamaker S; Close TJ; Lonardi S
BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):236. PubMed ID: 25879410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ENVirT: inference of ecological characteristics of viruses from metagenomic data.
Jayasundara D; Herath D; Senanayake D; Saeed I; Yang CY; Sun Y; Chang BC; Tang SL; Halgamuge SK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 19(Suppl 13):377. PubMed ID: 30717665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Correcting the Estimation of Viral Taxa Distributions in Next-Generation Sequencing Data after Applying Artificial Neural Networks.
Kohls M; Kircher M; Krepel J; Liebig P; Jung K
Genes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. NGS-eval: NGS Error analysis and novel sequence VAriant detection tooL.
May A; Abeln S; Buijs MJ; Heringa J; Crielaard W; Brandt BW
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W301-5. PubMed ID: 25878034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A platform-independent method for detecting errors in metagenomic sequencing data: DRISEE.
Keegan KP; Trimble WL; Wilkening J; Wilke A; Harrison T; D'Souza M; Meyer F
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(6):e1002541. PubMed ID: 22685393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. QuRe: software for viral quasispecies reconstruction from next-generation sequencing data.
Prosperi MC; Salemi M
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(1):132-3. PubMed ID: 22088846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tamock: simulation of habitat-specific benchmark data in metagenomics.
Gerner SM; Graf AB; Rattei T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 22(1):227. PubMed ID: 33932979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes.
Lin HH; Liao YC
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24175. PubMed ID: 27067514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ClassGraph: Improving Metagenomic Read Classification with Overlap Graphs.
Cavattoni M; Comin M
J Comput Biol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):633-647. PubMed ID: 37023405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Removal of false positives in metagenomics-based taxonomy profiling via targeting Type IIB restriction sites.
Sun Z; Liu J; Zhang M; Wang T; Huang S; Weiss ST; Liu YY
Nat Commun; 2023 Sep; 14(1):5321. PubMed ID: 37658057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantiles.
Van der Borght K; Thys K; Wetzels Y; Clement L; Verbist B; Reumers J; van Vlijmen H; Aerssens J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():379. PubMed ID: 26554718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with Illumina and Nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications.
Govender KN; Eyre DW
Microb Genom; 2022 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 36269282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A de Bruijn graph approach to the quantification of closely-related genomes in a microbial community.
Wang M; Ye Y; Tang H
J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):814-25. PubMed ID: 22697249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences.
Wang Z; Wang Y; Fuhrman JA; Sun F; Zhu S
Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):777-790. PubMed ID: 30860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
