206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2667910)
21. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study.
Blasi I; D'Amico R; Fenu V; Volpe A; Fuchs I; Henrich W; Mazza V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 20101635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictive value of ultrasound assessed fetal head position in primiparous women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; VON Brandis P; Eggebø TM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Nov; 91(11):1300-5. PubMed ID: 22774859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Effects of persistent occiput posterior presentation on mode of delivery].
Gardberg M; Tuppurainen M
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994 Aug; 198(4):117-9. PubMed ID: 7975796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The fetal head evaluation during labor in the occiput posterior position: the ESA (evaluation by simulation algorithm) approach.
Malvasi A; Bochicchio M; Vaira L; Longo A; Pacella E; Tinelli A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jul; 27(11):1151-7. PubMed ID: 24093425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor.
Chou MR; Kreiser D; Taslimi MM; Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):521-4. PubMed ID: 15343230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dystocia in late labor: determining fetal position by clinical and ultrasonic techniques.
Rayburn WF; Siemers KH; Legino LJ; Nabity MR; Anderson JC; Patil KD
Am J Perinatol; 1989 Jul; 6(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 2659012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries.
Gardberg M; Laakkonen E; Sälevaara M
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 May; 91(5 Pt 1):746-9. PubMed ID: 9572223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Labor with abnormal presentation and position.
Stitely ML; Gherman RB
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2005 Jun; 32(2):165-79. PubMed ID: 15899353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors affecting rotation of occiput posterior position during the first stage of labor.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Le Ray C; Lepleux F; De La Calle A; Dreyfus M; Chantry AA
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):119-125. PubMed ID: 29294363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section.
Reichman O; Gdansky E; Latinsky B; Labi S; Samueloff A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 17368909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prediction of labour and delivery by ascertaining the fetal head position with transabdominal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabour rupture of membranes after 37 weeks.
Eggebø TM; Heien C; Okland I; Gjessing LK; Smedvig E; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 17599279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Higher Rates of Operative Delivery and Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Persistent Occiput Posterior Position with a Large Head Circumference: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yagel O; Cohen SM; Lipschuetz M; Bdolah-Abram T; Amsalem H; Kabiri D; Yagel S
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 44(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 28728149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach?
Ghi T; Bellussi F; Eggebø T; Tondi F; Pacella G; Salsi G; Cariello L; Piastra A; Youssef A; Pilu G; Rizzo N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Nov; 28(16):1985-8. PubMed ID: 25316562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Martelli F; Bellussi F; Aiello E; Pilu G; Rizzo N; Frusca T; Arduini D; Rizzo G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 48(4):511-515. PubMed ID: 26565728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate.
Le Ray C; Serres P; Schmitz T; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):873-9. PubMed ID: 17906022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Current status of occiput posterior labor presentation].
Quiel V; Bormann S
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1993; 115(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 8503237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Correcting occiput posterior position during labor: the role of maternal positions].
Guittier MJ; Othenin-Girard V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Apr; 40(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 22099975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact on delivery outcome of ultrasonographic fetal head position prior to induction of labor.
Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Jauniaux E
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):618-25. PubMed ID: 17329512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recurrent persistent occipito-posterior position in subsequent deliveries.
Gardberg M; Stenwall O; Laakkonen E
BJOG; 2004 Feb; 111(2):170-1. PubMed ID: 14723756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Orientation of the fetal head at the time of engagement in induced labor].
Tribalat S; Lewin D; Tochon C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(7):937-9. PubMed ID: 3805618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
