837 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26679339)
21. The relationship between women-centred care and women's birth experiences: a comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan.
Iida M; Horiuchi S; Porter SE
Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 21835515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Experiences of women who planned birth in a birth centre compared to alternative planned places of birth. Results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
Hitzert M; Hermus MA; Scheerhagen M; Boesveld IC; Wiegers TA; van den Akker-van Marle ME; van Dommelen P; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; de Graaf JP
Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():70-8. PubMed ID: 27428101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
Forster DA; McLachlan HL; Davey MA; Biro MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Flood M; Shafiei T; Waldenström U
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26841782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
Christensen LF; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Births in freestanding midwifery-led units in Norway: What women view as important aspects of care.
Nørstebø HS; Nilsen ABV; Blix E; Bakken KS; Eri TS
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2023 Jun; 36():100857. PubMed ID: 37247500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.
Forster DA; McKay H; Davey MA; Small R; Cullinane F; Newton M; Powell R; McLachlan HL
Women Birth; 2019 Jun; 32(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30104172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Women's experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China.
Liu Y; Li T; Guo N; Jiang H; Li Y; Xu C; Yao X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33607963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does model of maternity care make a difference to birth outcomes for young women? A retrospective cohort study.
Allen J; Gibbons K; Beckmann M; Tracy M; Stapleton H; Kildea S
Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Aug; 52(8):1332-42. PubMed ID: 25952336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Continuity of care is an important and distinct aspect of childbirth experience: findings of a survey evaluating experienced continuity of care, experienced quality of care and women's perception of labor.
Perdok H; Verhoeven CJ; van Dillen J; Schuitmaker TJ; Hoogendoorn K; Colli J; Schellevis FG; de Jonge A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 29310627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The woman, partner and midwife: An integration of three perspectives of labour when intrapartum transfer from a birth centre to a tertiary obstetric unit occurs.
Kuliukas LJ; Hauck YC; Lewis L; Duggan R
Women Birth; 2017 Apr; 30(2):e125-e131. PubMed ID: 27825776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Client Experience with the Ontario Birth Center Demonstration Project.
Reszel J; Weiss D; Darling EK; Sidney D; Van Wagner V; Soderstrom B; Rogers J; Holmberg V; Peterson WE; Khan BM; Walker MC; Sprague AE
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2021 Mar; 66(2):174-184. PubMed ID: 33336882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia.
Homer CS; Davis GK; Cooke M; Barclay LM
Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 12139908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].
Takács L; Seidlerová JM; Smolík F; Hoskovcová S; Antonín P; Vařáková J; Valová A; Svoboda T; Dočkalová J
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Dec; 80(6):426-35. PubMed ID: 26741157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Processing birth experiences: A content analysis of women's preferences.
Sigurðardóttir VL; Gamble J; Guðmundsdóttir B; Sveinsdóttir H; Gottfreðsdóttir H
Midwifery; 2019 Feb; 69():29-38. PubMed ID: 30396158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Western Australian women's perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home.
Fenwick J; Butt J; Dhaliwal S; Hauck Y; Schmied V
Women Birth; 2010 Mar; 23(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 19632912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 'Not enough people to look after you': an exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland.
Larkin P; Begley CM; Devane D
Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21237541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.
Coxon K; Chisholm A; Malouf R; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 28359258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Women's experiences of transfer from a midwife-led to a consultant-led maternity unit in the UK during late pregnancy and labor.
Walker J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2000; 45(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 10812861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
