311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26679363)
1. Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.
Gomes LR; Gomes MR; Gonçalves JR; Ruellas AC; Wolford LM; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Cevidanes LH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jan; 121(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26679363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects.
Jones EM; Papio M; Tee BC; Beck FM; Fields HW; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 27364215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a novel imaging approach using multi-slice CT and cone-beam CT to follow-up on condylar remodeling after bimaxillary surgery.
Nicolielo LFP; Van Dessel J; Shaheen E; Letelier C; Codari M; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Int J Oral Sci; 2017 Sep; 9(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 28708129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography.
Bayram M; Kayipmaz S; Sezgin OS; Küçük M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1812-6. PubMed ID: 21680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
Xi T; van Loon B; Fudalej P; Bergé S; Swennen G; Maal T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23528746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
Loubele M; Maes F; Schutyser F; Marchal G; Jacobs R; Suetens P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional 3D superimposition to assess temporomandibular joint condylar morphology.
Schilling J; Gomes LC; Benavides E; Nguyen T; Paniagua B; Styner M; Boen V; Gonçalves JR; Cevidanes LH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(1):20130273. PubMed ID: 24170802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Faccioli N; Foti G; Barillari M; Atzei A; Mucelli RP
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1087-95. PubMed ID: 20224906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel region-growing based semi-automatic segmentation protocol for three-dimensional condylar reconstruction using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Xi T; Schreurs R; Heerink WJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111126. PubMed ID: 25401954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison--an in vitro study.
Hofmann E; Medelnik J; Fink M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 21378093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
