311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26679363)
21. Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning.
Poeschl PW; Schmidt N; Guevara-Rojas G; Seemann R; Ewers R; Zipko HT; Schicho K
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):317-24. PubMed ID: 22411262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Fracture Surgery: Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Surgical Splints by Integrating Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Images Into Multislice Computerized Tomography Images.
Ren J; Zhou Z; Li P; Tang W; Guo J; Wang H; Tian W
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 27(6):1415-9. PubMed ID: 27300464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling.
Verhelst PJ; Shaheen E; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Van der Cruyssen F; Shujaat S; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Swennen G; Politis C; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190364. PubMed ID: 31674794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Three-dimensional evaluation of condylar morphology remodeling after orthognathic surgery in mandibular retrognathism by cone-beam computed tomography].
Chen S; Liu XJ; Li ZL; Liang C; Wang XX; Fu KY; Yi B
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Aug; 47(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 26284413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 3-Dimensional CBCT analysis of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Nolte JW; Verhoeven TJ; Schreurs R; Bergé SJ; Karssemakers LH; Becking AG; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1970-1976. PubMed ID: 27818059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures.
Naitoh M; Nakahara K; Suenaga Y; Gotoh K; Kondo S; Ariji E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e25-31. PubMed ID: 20123365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography.
Dahmani-Causse M; Marx M; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Lepage B; Escudé B
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Nov; 128(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 22014530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements for Le Fort I osteotomy.
Gaia BF; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; Costa FF; Cavalcanti MG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 43(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 23867257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy and validity of stitching sectional cone beam computed tomographic images.
Kim MK; Kang SH; Lee EH; Lee SH; Park W
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1071-6. PubMed ID: 22777443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique.
Martorelli M; Ausiello P; Morrone R
J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 24412585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An
Patrick S; Birur NP; Gurushanth K; Raghavan AS; Gurudath S
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 28393820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.
Lang H; Neubauer J; Fritz B; Spira EM; Strube J; Langer M; Kotter E
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4551-4561. PubMed ID: 27003138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of biomarkers obtained from cone beam computed tomography in assessing the internal trabecular structure of the mandibular condyle.
Ebrahim FH; Ruellas ACO; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Jepsen K; Wolford L; Goncalves JR; Cevidanes LHS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Dec; 124(6):588-599. PubMed ID: 29055644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image integration of three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography angiogram into electroanatomical mapping system to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Ejima K; Shoda M; Yagishita D; Futagawa K; Yashiro B; Sato T; Manaka T; Nakajima T; Ohmori H; Hagiwara N
Europace; 2010 Jan; 12(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 19946112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography for small foreign body detection in the hand in comparison with radiography, MSCT and MRI: an ex vivo study.
Jandl NM; Rolvien T; Rupp T; Schumacher U; Püschel K; Maas KJ; Amling M; Henes FO; Spink C
Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):2841-2847. PubMed ID: 33487409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does formalin fixation influence MSCT/CBCT accuracy?
Seidel A; Bergauer B; Lell M; Buder T; von Wilmowsky C; Dach E; Wichmann M; Matta RE
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jan; 40(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28828519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types.
Paknahad M; Shahidi S; Abbaszade H
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 27357584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of condylar bone remodeling of temporomandibular joint based on cone-beam CT imaging].
Li Y; Liu MQ; Liu B; Lei J; Fu KY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32878395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.
Vandenberghe B; Luchsinger S; Hostens J; Dhoore E; Jacobs R;
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 22282512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
