593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26679776)
21. Mapping functional transcription factor networks from gene expression data.
Haynes BC; Maier EJ; Kramer MH; Wang PI; Brown H; Brent MR
Genome Res; 2013 Aug; 23(8):1319-28. PubMed ID: 23636944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Integrating genomic data to predict transcription factor binding.
Holloway DT; Kon M; DeLisi C
Genome Inform; 2005; 16(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 16362910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PlantPAN3.0: a new and updated resource for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks from ChIP-seq experiments in plants.
Chow CN; Lee TY; Hung YC; Li GZ; Tseng KC; Liu YH; Kuo PL; Zheng HQ; Chang WC
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(D1):D1155-D1163. PubMed ID: 30395277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Molecular and structural considerations of TF-DNA binding for the generation of biologically meaningful and accurate phylogenetic footprinting analysis: the LysR-type transcriptional regulator family as a study model.
Oliver P; Peralta-Gil M; Tabche ML; Merino E
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):686. PubMed ID: 27567672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Yeast cell cycle transcription factors identification by variable selection criteria.
Wang H; Wang YH; Wu WS
Gene; 2011 Oct; 485(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 21703335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identifying functional transcription factor binding sites in yeast by considering their positional preference in the promoters.
Lai FJ; Chiu CC; Yang TH; Huang YM; Wu WS
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83791. PubMed ID: 24386279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identifying biologically interpretable transcription factor knockout targets by jointly analyzing the transcription factor knockout microarray and the ChIP-chip data.
Yang TH; Wu WS
BMC Syst Biol; 2012 Aug; 6():102. PubMed ID: 22898448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PC-TraFF: identification of potentially collaborating transcription factors using pointwise mutual information.
Meckbach C; Tacke R; Hua X; Waack S; Wingender E; Gültas M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():400. PubMed ID: 26627005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Learning transcriptional networks from the integration of ChIP-chip and expression data in a non-parametric model.
Youn A; Reiss DJ; Stuetzle W
Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 26(15):1879-86. PubMed ID: 20525821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Identifying transcription factor targets using enhanced Bayesian classifier.
He D; Zhou D; Zhou Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Oct; 31(5-6):355-60. PubMed ID: 17890157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers.
Vandel J; Cassan O; Lèbre S; Lecellier CH; Bréhélin L
BMC Genomics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 30709337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A regulatory similarity measure using the location information of transcription factor binding sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Wu WS; Wei ML; Yeh CM; Chang DT
BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S9. PubMed ID: 25560196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Bayesian search for transcriptional motifs.
Miller AK; Print CG; Nielsen PM; Crampin EJ
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13897. PubMed ID: 21124986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identifying combinatorial regulation of transcription factors and binding motifs.
Kato M; Hata N; Banerjee N; Futcher B; Zhang MQ
Genome Biol; 2004; 5(8):R56. PubMed ID: 15287978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transcriptome network component analysis with limited microarray data.
Galbraith SJ; Tran LM; Liao JC
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1886-94. PubMed ID: 16766556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Base-resolution methylation patterns accurately predict transcription factor bindings in vivo.
Xu T; Li B; Zhao M; Szulwach KE; Street RC; Lin L; Yao B; Zhang F; Jin P; Wu H; Qin ZS
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):2757-66. PubMed ID: 25722376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genome-wide prediction and characterization of interactions between transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Yu X; Lin J; Masuda T; Esumi N; Zack DJ; Qian J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(3):917-27. PubMed ID: 16464824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. YAGM: a web tool for mining associated genes in yeast based on diverse biological associations.
Wu WS; Wang CC; Jhou MJ; Wang YC
BMC Syst Biol; 2015; 9 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S1. PubMed ID: 26678566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ChIPXpress: using publicly available gene expression data to improve ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip target gene ranking.
Wu G; Ji H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 14():188. PubMed ID: 23758851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Topological comparison of methods for predicting transcriptional cooperativity in yeast.
Aguilar D; Oliva B
BMC Genomics; 2008 Mar; 9():137. PubMed ID: 18366726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
