These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26679927)

  • 1. Network Structure and Biased Variance Estimation in Respondent Driven Sampling.
    Verdery AM; Mouw T; Bauldry S; Mucha PJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145296. PubMed ID: 26679927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) inference: A systematic review of the population mean and variance estimates.
    Abdesselam K; Verdery A; Pelude L; Dhami P; Momoli F; Jolly AM
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2020 Jan; 206():107702. PubMed ID: 31761476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling and analyzing respondent-driven sampling as a counting process.
    Berchenko Y; Rosenblatt JD; Frost SDW
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1189-1198. PubMed ID: 28257143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING: POINT ESTIMATES, VARIANCE, DEGREE MEASURES, AND OUT-OF-EQUILIBRIUM DATA.
    Wejnert C
    Sociol Methodol; 2009 Aug; 39(1):73-116. PubMed ID: 20161130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On The Robustness Of Respondent-Driven Sampling Estimators To Measurement Error.
    Fellows IE
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2022 Apr; 10(2):377-396. PubMed ID: 35449603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Respondent-driven sampling and the homophily configuration graph.
    Fellows IE
    Stat Med; 2019 Jan; 38(1):131-150. PubMed ID: 30259528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NEW SURVEY QUESTIONS AND ESTIMATORS FOR NETWORK CLUSTERING WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA.
    Verdery AM; Fisher JC; Siripong N; Abdesselam K; Bauldry S
    Sociol Methodol; 2017 Aug; 47(1):274-306. PubMed ID: 30337767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized least squares can overcome the critical threshold in respondent-driven sampling.
    Roch S; Rohe K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(41):10299-10304. PubMed ID: 30254152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A SIMULATION-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING FOR ESTIMATING CHARACTERISTICS IN POPULATIONS OF LESBIAN, GAY AND BISEXUAL OLDER ADULTS.
    Griffin M; Gile KJ; Fredricksen-Goldsen KI; Handcock MS; Erosheva EA
    Ann Appl Stat; 2018 Dec; 12(4):2252-2278. PubMed ID: 31632509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing respondent-driven sampling.
    Goel S; Salganik MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Apr; 107(15):6743-7. PubMed ID: 20351258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Respondent-Driven Sampling Prevalence Estimators Using Real-World Reported Network Degree.
    Avery L; Rotondi M
    Sociol Methodol; 2023 Aug; 53(2):269-287. PubMed ID: 37456805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Random Recruitment Assumption in Respondent-Driven Sampling in Egocentric Network Data.
    Liu H; Li J; Ha T; Li J
    Soc Netw; 2012 Oct; 1(2):13-21. PubMed ID: 23641317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. THE GRAPHICAL STRUCTURE OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING.
    Crawford FW
    Sociol Methodol; 2016; 46(1):187-211. PubMed ID: 31607761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology.
    Gile KJ; Handcock MS
    Sociol Methodol; 2010 Aug; 40(1):285-327. PubMed ID: 22969167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing Bias in Population Size Estimates Among Hidden Populations When Using the Service Multiplier Method Combined With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys: Survey Study.
    Chabata ST; Fearon E; Webb EL; Weiss HA; Hargreaves JR; Cowan FM
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 Jun; 6(2):e15044. PubMed ID: 32459645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting random walk based sampling in networks: evasion of burn-in period and frequent regenerations.
    Avrachenkov K; Borkar VS; Kadavankandy A; Sreedharan JK
    Comput Soc Netw; 2018; 5(1):4. PubMed ID: 29578546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Respondent-driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Goel S; Salganik MJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(17):2202-29. PubMed ID: 19572381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical adjustment of network degree in respondent-driven sampling estimators: venue attendance as a proxy for network size among young MSM.
    Fujimoto K; Cao M; Kuhns LM; Li D; Schneider JA
    Soc Networks; 2018 Jul; 54():118-131. PubMed ID: 29910531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Respondent-driven sampling: Advantages and disadvantages from a sampling method.
    Navarrete MS; Adrian C; Bachelet VC
    Medwave; 2022 Jan; 21(1):e8513. PubMed ID: 34979532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Respondent Driven Sampling Estimators to Determine HIV Prevalence and Population Characteristics among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Moscow, Russia.
    Wirtz AL; Mehta SH; Latkin C; Zelaya CE; Galai N; Peryshkina A; Mogilnyi V; Dzhigun P; Kostetskaya I; Beyrer C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155519. PubMed ID: 27248818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.