170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26680014)
41. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics.
Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A forward dynamics simulation of human lumbar spine flexion predicting the load sharing of intervertebral discs, ligaments, and muscles.
Rupp TK; Ehlers W; Karajan N; Günther M; Schmitt S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Oct; 14(5):1081-105. PubMed ID: 25653134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Stress distribution in the intervertebral disc correlates with strength distribution in subdiscal trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine.
Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):859-69. PubMed ID: 18423954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Functional anatomy of the caudal thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine in the horse.
Stubbs NC; Hodges PW; Jeffcott LB; Cowin G; Hodgson DR; McGowan CM
Equine Vet J Suppl; 2006 Aug; (36):393-9. PubMed ID: 17402454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Obesity is associated with reduced disc height in the lumbar spine but not at the lumbosacral junction.
Urquhart DM; Kurniadi I; Triangto K; Wang Y; Wluka AE; OʼSullivan R; Jones G; Cicuttini FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(16):E962-6. PubMed ID: 24825160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of microgravity on the biomechanical properties of lumbar and caudal intervertebral discs in mice.
Bailey JF; Hargens AR; Cheng KK; Lotz JC
J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):2983-8. PubMed ID: 25085756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sensitivity of muscle and intervertebral disc force computations to variations in muscle attachment sites.
Bayoglu R; Guldeniz O; Verdonschot N; Koopman B; Homminga J
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Nov; 22(14):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 31362525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Transmission of weight through the lower thoracic and lumbar regions of the vertebral column in man.
Pal GP; Routal RV
J Anat; 1987 Jun; 152():93-105. PubMed ID: 3654379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of geometric individualisation of a human spine model on load sharing: neuro-musculoskeletal simulation reveals significant differences in ligament and muscle contribution.
Meszaros-Beller L; Hammer M; Riede JM; Pivonka P; Little JP; Schmitt S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Apr; 22(2):669-694. PubMed ID: 36602716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quasi-static and dynamic properties of the intervertebral disc: experimental study and model parameter determination for the porcine lumbar motion segment.
Araújo ÂR; Peixinho N; Pinho AC; Claro JC
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2015; 17(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 26900017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Role of posture in mechanics of the lumbar spine in compression.
Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
J Spinal Disord; 1996 Aug; 9(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 8877953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biomechanical effect of posterior elements and ligamentous tissues of lumbar spine on load sharing.
Najarian S; Dargahi J; Heidari B
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 15911996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. In vivo measurement of lumbar foramen during axial loading using a compression device and computed tomography.
Iwata T; Miyamoto K; Hioki A; Ohashi M; Inoue N; Shimizu K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jul; 26(5):E177-82. PubMed ID: 23381186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.
Galbusera F; Schmidt H; Noailly J; Malandrino A; Lacroix D; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 21783132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Parametric modeling of the intervertebral disc space in 3D: application to CT images of the lumbar spine.
Korez R; Likar B; Pernuš F; Vrtovec T
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Oct; 38(7):596-605. PubMed ID: 24880891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions.
Lundon K; Bolton K
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2001 Jun; 31(6):291-303; discussion 304-6. PubMed ID: 11411624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Finite element based nonlinear normalization of human lumbar intervertebral disc stiffness to account for its morphology.
Maquer G; Laurent M; Brandejsky V; Pretterklieber ML; Zysset PK
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Jun; 136(6):061003. PubMed ID: 24671515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine influences vertebral loading predictions.
Bruno AG; Mokhtarzadeh H; Allaire BT; Velie KR; De Paolis Kaluza MC; Anderson DE; Bouxsein ML
J Orthop Res; 2017 Oct; 35(10):2164-2173. PubMed ID: 28092118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
