265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26680020)
1. Health care professionals' views of the factors influencing the decision to refer patients to a stroke rehabilitation trial.
Thomas N; Plant S; Woodward-Nutt K; Prior Y; Tyson S
Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():577. PubMed ID: 26680020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision-Making on Referral to Primary Care Physiotherapy After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.
Geerars M; Wondergem R; Pisters MF
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 May; 30(5):105667. PubMed ID: 33631474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
Rees S; Williams A
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals.
Lawton J; Snowdon C; Morrow S; Norman JE; Denison FC; Hallowell N
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():195. PubMed ID: 27066777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 'The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual': a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology.
Strong S; Paramasivan S; Mills N; Wilson C; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17(1):212. PubMed ID: 27113592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework to investigate why patients were or were not assessed for rehabilitation after stroke.
Lynch EA; Luker JA; Cadilhac DA; Fryer CE; Hillier SL
Clin Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 31(7):966-977. PubMed ID: 27421878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinician-researchers and custodians of scarce resources: a qualitative study of health professionals' views on barriers to the involvement of teenagers and young adults in cancer trials.
Hart RI; Hallowell N; Harden J; Jesudason AB; Lawton J
Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 31924260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing and public participation in health: an ethnographic study of a patient council.
Brooks F
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Jan; 45(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 17046769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing a complex rehabilitation intervention in a stroke trial: a qualitative process evaluation of AVERT.
Luker JA; Craig LE; Bennett L; Ellery F; Langhorne P; Wu O; Bernhardt J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():52. PubMed ID: 27164839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Qualitative investigation of the perceptions and experiences of nursing and allied health professionals involved in the implementation of an enriched environment in an Australian acute stroke unit.
Rosbergen ICM; Brauer SG; Fitzhenry S; Grimley RS; Hayward KS
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018226. PubMed ID: 29273658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.
Koffman J; Yorganci E; Murtagh F; Yi D; Gao W; Barclay S; Pickles A; Higginson I; Johnson H; Wilson R; Bailey S; Ewart C; Evans C
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(55):1-150. PubMed ID: 31594555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study.
Chhoa CY; Sawyer A; Ayers S; Pushpa-Rajah A; Duley L
Trials; 2017 Apr; 18(1):196. PubMed ID: 28446203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Making patients better: a qualitative descriptive study of registered nurses' reasons for working in surgical areas.
Mackintosh C
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17518888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring attitudes towards a randomised controlled trial of venous access devices – a nested pre-trial qualitative study.
Ritchie M; Kelly LJ; Moss J; Paul J; Shaw R
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 26349872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From dictatorship to a reluctant democracy: stroke therapists talking about self-management.
Norris M; Kilbride C
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23594054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors Influencing the Delivery of Intensive Rehabilitation in Stroke: Patient Perceptions Versus Rehabilitation Therapist Perceptions.
Janssen J; Klassen TD; Connell LA; Eng JJ
Phys Ther; 2020 Feb; 100(2):307-316. PubMed ID: 31711211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staff's views on delivering patient-led therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study with lessons for trial fidelity.
Horne M; Thomas N; Vail A; Selles R; McCabe C; Tyson S
Trials; 2015 Apr; 16():137. PubMed ID: 25873095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What influences decisions about ongoing stroke rehabilitation for patients with pre-existing dementia or cognitive impairment: a qualitative study?
Longley V; Peters S; Swarbrick C; Bowen A
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Aug; 32(8):1133-1144. PubMed ID: 29589474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caring for continence in stroke care settings: a qualitative study of patients' and staff perspectives on the implementation of a new continence care intervention.
Brady MC; Jamieson K; Bugge C; Hagen S; McClurg D; Chalmers C; Langhorne P
Clin Rehabil; 2016 May; 30(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 26048436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
