255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26680251)
1. Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders.
Leguízamo A; Lee SC; Jeglic EL; Calkins C
Sex Abuse; 2017 Dec; 29(8):765-785. PubMed ID: 26680251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland.
Gonçalves LC; Gerth J; Rossegger A; Noll T; Endrass J
Sex Abuse; 2020 Mar; 32(2):203-219. PubMed ID: 30623752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?
Hanson RK; Thornton D; Helmus LM; Babchishin KM
Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):218-52. PubMed ID: 25810478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 2015 Static-99R: Alternative Recidivism Tables for High-Risk Offenders.
Elwood RW; Kelley SM; Mundt JC
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Oct; 61(14):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 26758206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever.
Hanson RK; Harris AJ; Helmus L; Thornton D
J Interpers Violence; 2014 Oct; 29(15):2792-813. PubMed ID: 24664250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three Central Dimensions of Sexual Recidivism Risk: Understanding the Latent Constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R.
Brouillette-Alarie S; Proulx J; Hanson RK
Sex Abuse; 2018 Sep; 30(6):676-704. PubMed ID: 28183223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.
Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Cuervo VA; Murrie DC; Clark JW
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):418-27. PubMed ID: 24377910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recidivism Risk Assessment for Adult Sexual Offenders.
Holoyda BJ; Newman WJ
Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2016 Feb; 18(2):17. PubMed ID: 26781555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying the relative risk of sex offenders: risk ratios for static-99R.
Hanson RK; Babchishin KM; Helmus L; Thornton D
Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):482-515. PubMed ID: 23264543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R?
Looman J; Morphett NA; Abracen J
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive accuracy of Static-99R across different racial/ethnic groups: A meta-analysis.
Ahmed S; Lee SC; Helmus LM
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):275-291. PubMed ID: 36931863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive and incremental validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and STABLE-2007 for sexual recidivism: A diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA).
Holper L; Cerullo E; Mokros A; Habermeyer E
Psychol Assess; 2024 Feb; 36(2):134-146. PubMed ID: 38059959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of High-Intensity Inpatient Sex Offender Treatment in the Netherlands.
Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
Sex Abuse; 2016 Aug; 28(5):469-85. PubMed ID: 24867416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders.
Boccaccini MT; Rice AK; Helmus LM; Murrie DC; Harris PB
Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):611-623. PubMed ID: 28594205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive Validity of Static-99R Among 8,207 Men Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korea: A Prospective Field Study.
Lee SC; Hanson RK; Yoon JS
Sex Abuse; 2023 Sep; 35(6):687-715. PubMed ID: 36394612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
