These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26680564)

  • 21. Factors Associated With Hemostatic Agent Use During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Kakos A; Allen V; Whiteside J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 27590570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.
    Moen M; Noone M; Cholkeri-Singh A; Vassallo B; Locker B; Miller C
    J Robot Surg; 2014 Mar; 8(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 27637233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is there evidence of a July effect among patients undergoing hysterectomy surgery?
    Varma S; Mehta A; Hutfless S; Stone RL; Wethington SL; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):176.e1-176.e9. PubMed ID: 29870735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training.
    Farivar BS; Flannagan M; Leitman IM
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 25451717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hysterectomy Volume Among Recent Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Graduates.
    Cadish LA; Kropat G; Muffly TM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):382-387. PubMed ID: 32371719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial.
    Obermair A; Armfield NR; Graves N; Gebski V; Hanna GB; Coleman MG; Hughes A; Janda M
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027155. PubMed ID: 31072858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program into obstetrics/gynecology residency curricula.
    Vetter MH; Palettas M; Hade E; Fowler J; Salani R
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):517-521. PubMed ID: 29285654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.
    Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic Surgery Training in an OB/GYN Residency Program: A Survey Investigating the Optimal Training and Credentialing of OB/GYN Residents.
    Peterson S; Mayer A; Nelson B; Roland P
    Conn Med; 2015 Aug; 79(7):395-9. PubMed ID: 26411175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training.
    Burkett D; Horwitz J; Kennedy V; Murphy D; Graziano S; Kenton K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2011 Sep; 17(5):210-4. PubMed ID: 22453103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Smaller pieces of the hysterectomy pie: current challenges in resident surgical education.
    Pulliam SJ; Berkowitz LR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):395-8. PubMed ID: 19155911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopy-to-laparotomy quotient in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.
    Sami Walid M; Heaton RL
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 May; 283(5):1027-31. PubMed ID: 20414665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes.
    Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.
    Wasson MN; Hoffman MK
    Del Med J; 2015 Feb; 87(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 25876290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Sandadi S; Gadzinski JA; Lee S; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Gardner GJ; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 24262878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An Assessment of the Continuing Surgical Education Program, a Surgical Preceptor Program for Faculty Members.
    Cundiff GW; Geoffrion R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Nov; 38(11):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 27969560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modular comparison of laparoscopic and robotic simulation platforms in residency training: a randomized trial.
    Borahay MA; Haver MC; Eastham B; Patel PR; Kilic GS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):871-9. PubMed ID: 23811381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Teaching of total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a gynecological laparoscopy university diploma course].
    Morgan Ortiz F; López Zepeda MA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Sep; 79(9):547-52. PubMed ID: 21966855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.