306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26680565)
1. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy.
Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG
J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Do we need to perform systematic supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?].
Saliba E; Nisolle M; Tchente C; De Landsheere L
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019; 47(7-8):549-554. PubMed ID: 31003018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy.
Chen Y; Li J; Zhang Y; Hua K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 29107118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes.
Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):649-655. PubMed ID: 30338370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Nygaard I; Brubaker L; Zyczynski HM; Cundiff G; Richter H; Gantz M; Fine P; Menefee S; Ridgeway B; Visco A; Warren LK; Zhang M; Meikle S
JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):2016-24. PubMed ID: 23677313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
