These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26680565)

  • 1. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy.
    Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Do we need to perform systematic supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?].
    Saliba E; Nisolle M; Tchente C; De Landsheere L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019; 47(7-8):549-554. PubMed ID: 31003018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy.
    Chen Y; Li J; Zhang Y; Hua K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 29107118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes.
    Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):649-655. PubMed ID: 30338370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Nygaard I; Brubaker L; Zyczynski HM; Cundiff G; Richter H; Gantz M; Fine P; Menefee S; Ridgeway B; Visco A; Warren LK; Zhang M; Meikle S
    JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):2016-24. PubMed ID: 23677313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
    Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.