These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26681991)

  • 1. Optimizing Hybrid Metrology: Rigorous Implementation of Bayesian and Combined Regression.
    Henn MA; Silver RM; Villarrubia JS; Zhang NF; Zhou H; Barnes BM; Ming B; Vladár AE
    J Micro Nanolithogr MEMS MOEMS; 2015; 14(4):0440011-440018. PubMed ID: 26681991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving optical measurement uncertainty with combined multitool metrology using a Bayesian approach.
    Zhang NF; Silver RM; Zhou H; Barnes BM
    Appl Opt; 2012 Sep; 51(25):6196-206. PubMed ID: 22945168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enabling Quantitative Optical Imaging for In-die-capable Critical Dimension Targets.
    Barnes BM; Henn MA; Sohn MY; Zhou H; Silver RM
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2016; 9778():. PubMed ID: 28757674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Device based in-chip critical dimension and overlay metrology.
    Kim YN; Paek JS; Rabello S; Lee S; Hu J; Liu Z; Hao Y; McGahan W
    Opt Express; 2009 Nov; 17(23):21336-43. PubMed ID: 19997373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging as a Biomarker: Standards for Change Measurements in Therapy workshop summary.
    Clarke LP; Sriram RD; Schilling LB
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):501-30. PubMed ID: 18389935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical high-power nonlinearity comparison between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Metrology Institute of Japan at 1480 nm.
    Vayshenker I; Yang S; Amemiya K; Mukai S; Zama T
    Appl Opt; 2010 Jan; 49(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 20062487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does your SEM really tell the truth?--How would you know? Part 1.
    Postek MT; Vladár AE
    Scanning; 2013; 35(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 23427011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a new hybrid approach combining AFM and SEM for the nanoparticle dimensional metrology.
    Crouzier L; Delvallée A; Ducourtieux S; Devoille L; Noircler G; Ulysse C; Taché O; Barruet E; Tromas C; Feltin N
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2019; 10():1523-1536. PubMed ID: 31431864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fourier domain optical tool normalization for quantitative parametric image reconstruction.
    Qin J; Silver RM; Barnes BM; Zhou H; Goasmat F
    Appl Opt; 2013 Sep; 52(26):6512-22. PubMed ID: 24085127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodology for evaluating the information distribution in small angle scattering from periodic nanostructures.
    Sunday DF; Kline RJ
    J Micro Nanolithogr MEMS MOEMS; 2018; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 33033553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interlaboratory Study on the Lithographically Produced Scanning Electron Microscope Magnification Standard Prototype.
    Postek MT; Vladar AE; Jones SN; Keery WJ
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1993; 98(4):447-467. PubMed ID: 28053483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roles of chemical metrology in electronics industry and associated environment in Korea: a tutorial.
    Kang N; Joong Kim K; Seog Kim J; Hae Lee J
    Talanta; 2015 Mar; 134():284-291. PubMed ID: 25618669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistics and Measurements.
    Croarkin MC
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2001; 106(1):279-92. PubMed ID: 27500023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty in NIST Force Measurements.
    Bartel T
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2005; 110(6):589-603. PubMed ID: 27308181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference materials and reference measurement procedures: an overview from a national metrology institute.
    Bunk DM
    Clin Biochem Rev; 2007 Nov; 28(4):131-7. PubMed ID: 18392127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trilateral optical powermeter comparison between NIST, NMIJ/AIST, and METAS.
    Vayshenker I; Lehman JH; Livigni DJ; Li X; Amemiya K; Fukuda D; Mukai S; Kimura S; Endo M; Morel J; Gambon A
    Appl Opt; 2007 Feb; 46(5):643-7. PubMed ID: 17279148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEM characterization of silicon nanostructures: can we meet the challenge?
    Myhajlenko S; Luby AS; Fischer AM; Ponce FA; Tracy C
    Scanning; 2008; 30(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 18561254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation of CD-SEM images for linewidth and critical dimension metrology.
    Li YG; Zhang P; Ding ZJ
    Scanning; 2013; 35(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 22887037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microsphere-assisted hyperspectral imaging: super-resolution, non-destructive metrology for semiconductor devices.
    Park J; Choi Y; Kwon S; Lee Y; Kim J; Kim JJ; Lee J; Ahn J; Kwak H; Yang Y; Jo T; Lee M; Kim K
    Light Sci Appl; 2024 May; 13(1):122. PubMed ID: 38806499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods to account for uncertainties in exposure assessment in studies of environmental exposures.
    Wu Y; Hoffman FO; Apostoaei AI; Kwon D; Thomas BA; Glass R; Zablotska LB
    Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 18(1):31. PubMed ID: 30961632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.