191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26682136)
21. Linearity of patient positioning detection : a phantom study of skin markers, cone beam computed tomography, and 3D ultrasound.
Ballhausen H; Hieber S; Li M; Parodi K; Belka C; Reiner M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 May; 191(5):442-7. PubMed ID: 25633164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Potential systematic uncertainties in IGRT when FBCT reference images are used for pancreatic tumors.
Amoush A; Abdel-Wahab M; Abazeed M; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5257. PubMed ID: 26103487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early clinical experience with kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy for interfraction motion management.
Lawson JD; Fox T; Elder E; Nowlan A; Davis L; Keller J; Crocker I
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 18973853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Going from 3D/3D to 2D/3D registration for noncoplanar setup verification in intracranial single-isocenter multiple-target hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: comparison between kilo-voltage/mega-voltage image pairs and noncoplanar cone-beam computed tomography.
Lai J; Liu S; Liu J; Fu M; Jiang M; Li A; Li B; Li X; Cheng X; Zhou L
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Dec; 13(12):8094-8106. PubMed ID: 38106274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vector analysis of prostate patient setup with image-guided radiation therapy via kV cone beam computed tomography.
Perks J; Turnbull H; Liu T; Purdy J; Valicenti R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(3):915-9. PubMed ID: 20643510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of prostate set-up accuracy and margins with off-line bony anatomy corrections and online implanted fiducial-based corrections.
Greer PB; Dahl K; Ebert MA; Wratten C; White M; Denham JW
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 19032399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study.
Olch AJ; Alaei P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 22(2):85-89. PubMed ID: 33450139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PTV margin definition in hypofractionated IGRT of localized prostate cancer using cone beam CT and orthogonal image pairs with fiducial markers.
Oehler C; Lang S; Dimmerling P; Bolesch C; Kloeck S; Tini A; Glanzmann C; Najafi Y; Studer G; Zwahlen DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9():229. PubMed ID: 25384898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography prostate localization with online ultrasound and fiducial markers methods.
Gayou O; Miften M
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 18383674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT.
Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Reiner M; Tritschler S; Gratzke C; Manapov F; Corradini S; Ganswindt U; Belka C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Mar; 193(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 27928626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Localization accuracy of two electromagnetic tracking systems in prostate cancer radiotherapy: A comparison with fiducial marker based kilovoltage imaging.
Vanhanen A; Syrén H; Kapanen M
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():10-18. PubMed ID: 30527084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of daily cone-beam computed tomography and kilovoltage planar imaging for target localization in prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy.
Simpson DR; Einck JP; Nath SK; Sethi RA; Wang JZ; Mundt AJ; Sandhu AP
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2011; 1(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 24673945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An Investigation of the Feasibility and Utility of a Low-dose Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scan Protocol for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
Turner A; McGuffin M; Au P
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 46(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 31052087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizing cone-beam CT image-guidance with a robotic couch: intrafraction motion analysis accounting for all six degrees of freedom.
Hyde D; Lochray F; Korol R; Davidson M; Wong CS; Ma L; Sahgal A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e555-62. PubMed ID: 22284042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Setup margin for head-and-neck cancer patients receiving 2D-2D and 3D image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy].
Kovács P; Szita E; Schvarcz K; Kamu S; Kalincsák J; Kovács Á; Repa I; Hadjiev J
Orv Hetil; 2018 Jul; 159(29):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 30008233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On-board patient positioning for head-and-neck IMRT: comparing digital tomosynthesis to kilovoltage radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Wu QJ; Godfrey DJ; Wang Z; Zhang J; Zhou S; Yoo S; Brizel DM; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):598-606. PubMed ID: 17869673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Daily online bony correction is required for prostate patients without fiducial markers or soft-tissue imaging.
Johnston ML; Vial P; Wiltshire KL; Bell LJ; Blome S; Kerestes Z; Morgan GW; O'Driscoll D; Shakespeare TP; Eade TN
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Sep; 23(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 21470835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is it essential to use fiducial markers during cone-beam CT-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients?
Yildirim BA; Onal C; Dolek Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27730453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Image-guided radiation therapy for post-operative gynaecologic cancer: patient set up verification with and without implanted fiducial markers.
Murrell DH; Warner A; Benwell Q; Wells W; Scott D; Velker V; Hajdok G; D'Souza DP
Acta Oncol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):1346-1351. PubMed ID: 29774779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Initial experience with megavoltage (MV) CT guidance for daily prostate alignments.
Langen KM; Zhang Y; Andrews RD; Hurley ME; Meeks SL; Poole DO; Willoughby TR; Kupelian PA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1517-24. PubMed ID: 16029814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
