These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26682343)
21. Caesarean section should be available on request: FOR: the mother's autonomy should be paramount. Gee H BJOG; 2015 Feb; 122(3):359. PubMed ID: 25623570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Finding autonomy in birth. ; Kukla R; Kuppermann M; Little M; Lyerly AD; Mitchell LM; Armstrong EM; Harris L Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19076937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Increasing cesarean rates: the balance of technology, autonomy, and beneficence. Shah KR Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):58-9. PubMed ID: 22694040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. C-section for organ donation. Berkowitz ST; Newman LE; Mathieu DR Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(2):22; discussion 22-4. PubMed ID: 2318622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 3763090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cesarean section on request. Abushama M; Ahmed B Saudi Med J; 2004 Dec; 25(12):1820-3. PubMed ID: 15711647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Female autonomy and elective abdominal delivery. de Roubaix M S Afr Med J; 2005 Jul; 95(7):452. PubMed ID: 16156429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. Nguyen MT; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA J Perinat Med; 2017 Jul; 45(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 27780155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. It is the right of every anaesthetist to refuse to participate in a maternal-request caesarean section. Gass CW Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Jan; 15(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 16325392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reflection on the physician's responsibility to mother and fetus. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Biomedical Ethics Committee Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1993 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 11659577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Supporting pregnant women through difficult decisions: a case of prenatal diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta. Coors ME; Townsend SF J Clin Ethics; 2006; 17(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 17186940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 23059404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Caesarean section--indication or choice?]. Krepelka P Ceska Gynekol; 2008 Oct; 73(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 19110959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Managing Care of an Intrapartum Patient with Agitation and Psychosis: Ethical and Legal Implications. McCullough LB; Chervenak FA; Coverdale JH AMA J Ethics; 2016 Mar; 18(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 27002991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Reply to Sarah Burns. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery. Bergeron V Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):478-87. PubMed ID: 17927624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]