194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26682916)
1. An Automated Strategy for Binding-Pose Selection and Docking Assessment in Structure-Based Drug Design.
Ballante F; Marshall GR
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jan; 56(1):54-72. PubMed ID: 26682916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and synthesis of benzodiazepine analogs as isoform-selective human lysine deacetylase inhibitors.
Reddy DR; Ballante F; Zhou NJ; Marshall GR
Eur J Med Chem; 2017 Feb; 127():531-553. PubMed ID: 28109947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A New, Improved Hybrid Scoring Function for Molecular Docking and Scoring Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2016 Apr; 87(4):618-25. PubMed ID: 26643167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: structure-based modeling and isoform-selectivity prediction.
Silvestri L; Ballante F; Mai A; Marshall GR; Ragno R
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2215-35. PubMed ID: 22762501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carboxylic acid derivatives display potential selectivity for human histone deacetylase 6: Structure-based virtual screening, molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies.
Uba AI; Yelekçi K
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Aug; 75():131-142. PubMed ID: 29859380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Autodock Vina Adopts More Accurate Binding Poses but Autodock4 Forms Better Binding Affinity.
Nguyen NT; Nguyen TH; Pham TNH; Huy NT; Bay MV; Pham MQ; Nam PC; Vu VV; Ngo ST
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 31887035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards predictive docking at aminergic G-protein coupled receptors.
Jakubík J; El-Fakahany EE; Doležal V
J Mol Model; 2015 Nov; 21(11):284. PubMed ID: 26453085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking docking and scoring protocol for the identification of potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
Zaheer-ul-Haq ; Halim SA; Uddin R; Madura JD
J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Jun; 28(8):870-82. PubMed ID: 20447848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Practical Guide to Molecular Docking and Homology Modelling for Medicinal Chemists.
Lohning AE; Levonis SM; Williams-Noonan B; Schweiker SS
Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(18):2023-2040. PubMed ID: 28137238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
Chaput L; Mouawad L
J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Assessment of Docking Programs for Docking and Virtual Screening of Ribosomal Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agents.
Buckley ME; Ndukwe ARN; Nair PC; Rana S; Fairfull-Smith KE; Gandhi NS
Antibiotics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36978331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
Bjerrum EJ
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Docking of hydroxamic acids into HDAC1 and HDAC8: a rationalization of activity trends and selectivities.
Ortore G; Di Colo F; Martinelli A
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2774-85. PubMed ID: 19947584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
