These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26683042)

  • 1. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Vaden KI; Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Teubner-Rhodes SE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 26683042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when.
    Vaden KI; Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 35(9):3929-37. PubMed ID: 25740521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.
    Vaden KI; Teubner-Rhodes S; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jun; 253():119042. PubMed ID: 35259524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.
    Vaden KI; Kuchinsky SE; Cute SL; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 33(48):18979-86. PubMed ID: 24285902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.
    Vaden KI; Teubner-Rhodes S; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():381-387. PubMed ID: 28624645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task.
    Vaden KI; Eckert MA; Dubno JR; Harris KC
    J Neurosci Res; 2020 Apr; 98(4):680-691. PubMed ID: 31385349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Kuchinsky SE; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 26683041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.
    Eckert MA; Teubner-Rhodes S; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; McClaskey CM; Dubno JR
    Brain Struct Funct; 2022 Jan; 227(1):203-218. PubMed ID: 34632538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Weakley DG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extended High-Frequency Thresholds: Associations With Demographic and Risk Factors, Cognitive Ability, and Hearing Outcomes in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.
    Helfer KS; Maldonado L; Matthews LJ; Simpson AN; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1427-1443. PubMed ID: 38987892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble.
    Wilson RH; Abrams HB; Pillion AL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 15074443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise.
    Drennan WR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 34727540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.