BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26683122)

  • 1. An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.
    Vigolo P; Buzzo O; Buzzo M; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 26683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.
    Checketts MR; Turkyilmaz I; Asar NV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
    Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of chewing simulation on surface roughness of resin composite when opposed by zirconia ceramic and lithium disilicate ceramic.
    Ho TK; Satterthwaite JD; Silikas N
    Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):e15-e24. PubMed ID: 29175160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of various scaling instruments on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate.
    Yilmaz M; Demir E; Olcay EO
    Eur Oral Res; 2023 Sep; 57(3):133-137. PubMed ID: 37929219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing.
    Lawson NC; Janyavula S; Syklawer S; McLaren EA; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1586-91. PubMed ID: 25257823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
    Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength, phase transformation, and surface roughness of bilayered porcelain/zirconia dental ceramics.
    Bankoğlu Güngör M; Yılmaz H; Karakoca Nemli S; Turhan Bal B; Aydın C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 25858226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Johnston W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 25957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia.
    Srikanth R; Kosmac T; Della Bona A; Yin L; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2015 Apr; 31(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 25687628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
    Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human epithelial tissue culture study on restorative materials.
    Forster A; Ungvári K; Györgyey Á; Kukovecz Á; Turzó K; Nagy K
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24269830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials.
    Nassary Zadeh P; Lümkemann N; Sener B; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):948-954. PubMed ID: 29807742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The extent of luting agent remnants on titanium and zirconia abutment analogs after scaling.
    Behr M; Spitzer A; Preis V; Weng D; Gosau M; Rosentritt M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25216147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
    Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.