These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2668346)
1. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems. Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Mar; 55(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6340021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Jul; 11(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 6378985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Janssen PT; van Aken J J Clin Periodontol; 1989 May; 16(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 2656771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions. Kullendorff B; Gröndahl K; Rohlin M; Nilsson M Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions. Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Feb; 55(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 6340017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain. Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region. Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles. Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital subtraction radiography for the detection of periodontal bone changes]. Mera T Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Mar; 31(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 2517790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection. Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subtraction radiography and computer assisted densitometric analyses of standardized radiographs. A comparison study with 125I absorptiometry. Ortman LF; Dunford R; McHenry K; Hausmann E J Periodontal Res; 1985 Nov; 20(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 2935619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of three-walled infrabony defects by subtraction radiography. Putnins E; Lavelle CL; Holthuis A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jan; 65(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 3277105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study. Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 9574959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examiner agreement in estimating changes in periodontal bone from conventional and subtraction radiographs. Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Wennström J; Heijl L J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 14(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 3546401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study. Dove SB; McDavid WD; Hamilton KE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jun; 89(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 10846136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital subtraction of radiograph in evaluating alveolar bone changes after initial periodontal therapy. Okano T; Mera T; Ohki M; Ishikawa I; Yamada N Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Feb; 69(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 2406677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital imaging in periodontal radiography. A review. Brägger U J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Oct; 15(9):551-7. PubMed ID: 3058754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]