167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2668346)
1. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
Gröndahl K
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems.
Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Mar; 55(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6340021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique.
Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Jul; 11(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 6378985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
Janssen PT; van Aken J
J Clin Periodontol; 1989 May; 16(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 2656771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions.
Kullendorff B; Gröndahl K; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions.
Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Feb; 55(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 6340017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital subtraction radiography for the detection of periodontal bone changes].
Mera T
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Mar; 31(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 2517790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subtraction radiography and computer assisted densitometric analyses of standardized radiographs. A comparison study with 125I absorptiometry.
Ortman LF; Dunford R; McHenry K; Hausmann E
J Periodontal Res; 1985 Nov; 20(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 2935619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of three-walled infrabony defects by subtraction radiography.
Putnins E; Lavelle CL; Holthuis A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jan; 65(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 3277105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study.
Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 9574959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examiner agreement in estimating changes in periodontal bone from conventional and subtraction radiographs.
Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Wennström J; Heijl L
J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 14(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 3546401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study.
Dove SB; McDavid WD; Hamilton KE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jun; 89(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 10846136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital subtraction of radiograph in evaluating alveolar bone changes after initial periodontal therapy.
Okano T; Mera T; Ohki M; Ishikawa I; Yamada N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Feb; 69(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 2406677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital imaging in periodontal radiography. A review.
Brägger U
J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Oct; 15(9):551-7. PubMed ID: 3058754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
