184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26684996)
1. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.
Johnson KB; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Aug; 89(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 26304948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization.
Couture RA; Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 15961598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
Mamoun JS
Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.
Sommers TM; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall DA
J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11935928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two film holders for periapical radiography performed by dental students.
Choksi SK; Rao MS
MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9569872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.
Rudolph DJ; White SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jun; 65(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 3041341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating photo-stimulable phosphor plates into dental and dental hygiene radiography curricula.
Tax CL; Robb CL; Brillant MG; Doucette HJ
J Dent Educ; 2013 Nov; 77(11):1451-60. PubMed ID: 24192410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
Fuhrmann AW
Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor image plate artifacts and their prevalence.
Elkhateeb SM; Aloyouny AY; Omer MMS; Mansour SM
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 35097068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital imaging for dental caries.
Wenzel A
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):319-38, vi. PubMed ID: 10740771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
