BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26684996)

  • 21. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
    Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
    Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department.
    Gulsahi A; Secgin CK
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26856290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
    Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.
    Hildebolt CF; Couture RA; Whiting BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):273-97, vi. PubMed ID: 10740769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
    Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
    Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique.
    Chen CH; Lin SH; Chiu HL; Lin YJ; Chen YK; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):758-60. PubMed ID: 17509422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Errors generated with the use of rectangular collimation.
    Parks ET
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 2052340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oral and dental imaging equipment and techniques for small animals.
    Coffman CR; Brigden GM
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2013 May; 43(3):489-506. PubMed ID: 23643018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
    Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An overview of radiographic film holders.
    Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Mar; 34(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15829687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.