These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2668508)

  • 1. Tensile strength of elastomeric impression materials, adhesive and cohesive bonding.
    Cullen DR; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 2668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peel bond strength between 3D printing tray materials and elastomeric impression/adhesive systems: A laboratory study.
    Xu Y; Huettig F; Schille C; Schweizer E; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Spintzyk S
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):e241-e254. PubMed ID: 32456949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bond between wash elastomers and putty silicones].
    Pfeiffer P; Sommer MP; Schwickerath H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jul; 46(7):464-7. PubMed ID: 1817908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strengths between elastomeric impression materials and disinfected preliminary impressions.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Bell LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8196006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
    Morneburg T
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tensile and bond strength of putty-wash elastomeric impression materials.
    Sandrik JL; Vacco JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Sep; 50(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 6352923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
    Ona M; Takahashi H; Sato M; Igarashi Y; Wakabayashi N
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of time on the adhesion of light-body to heavy-body Express in the two-step reline polyvinylsiloxane impression technique.
    Purk JH; Hung SH; Chappell RP; Casper RL; Eick JD
    Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 2095804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of physical properties of light-curing and self-curing dental impression materials.
    Hsieh CC; Liu CC; Chen RS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1994 Apr; 93(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 7914770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength and accuracy of combined reversible-irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems.
    Lepe X; Sandrik JL; Land MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 1527744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile bond strength between custom tray and elastomeric impression material.
    Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Oka M; Minagi S; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May; 26(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 17694739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of resilient denture lining materials polymerized by different methods after thermal cycling.
    León BL; Del Bel Cury AA; Rodrigues Garcia RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 15775930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials.
    Lu H; Nguyen B; Powers JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15295324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peel bond strengths of five impression material tray adhesives.
    MacSween R; Price RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug; 57(8):654-7. PubMed ID: 1889016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.