182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2668509)
1. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
Curtis DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 2668509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators.
Ratzmann A; Mundt T; Schwahn C; Langforth G; Hutzen D; Gedrange T; Kordass B
Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 18271499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of lateral interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
Curtis DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jul; 62(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2746537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An
Keerthana SR; Mohammed HS; Hariprasad A; Anand M; Ayesha S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R
Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of condylar inclination of dentulous subjects determined by axiograph and to compare with manual programming of articulators using protrusive interocclusal record.
Prasad KD; Shetty M; Chandy BK
Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 26321837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
Price RB; Bannerman RA
J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of condylar inclination settings in two types of semiadjustable articulators.
Zabarović D; Vojvodić D; Katanec D; Jerolimov V; Carek V; Vusić J
Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 19662760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of wax interocclusal records on different articulators.
Boulos PJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(6):755-759. PubMed ID: 30589004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Setting the Sagittal Condylar Inclination on a Virtual Articulator Using Intraoral Scan of Protrusive Interocclusal Position and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Hong SJ; Choi Y; Park M; Paek J; Pae A; Kim HS; Kwon KR; Noh K
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):185-189. PubMed ID: 31919939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Setting the sagittal condylar inclination on a virtual articulator by using a facial and intraoral scan of the protrusive interocclusal position: A dental technique.
Hong SJ; Noh K
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):392-395. PubMed ID: 32220398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mandibular movements recorded by two pantographs.
Donaldson K; Clayton JA
J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jan; 55(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 3456048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
Chang WS; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; Tabacco MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique.
Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):587-593. PubMed ID: 26833815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of interocclusal records on the condylar path of the articulator].
Angyal J; Bukovinszki K; Keszthelyi G
Fogorv Sz; 2002 Apr; 95(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 11980427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review.
Lassmann Ł; Nowak Z; Żółtowska A
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 38123416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
Baker PJ; Setchell DJ; Tredwin CJ
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
