These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2668509)

  • 21. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Novel Technique to Align the Intraoral Scans to the Virtual Articulator and Set the Patient-Specific Sagittal Condylar Inclination.
    Yang S; Feng N; Li D; Wu Y; Yue L; Yuan Q
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 34170604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.
    Pelletier LB; Campbell SD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 1774679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.
    Galagali G; Kalekhan SM; Nidawani P; Naik J; Behera S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 27141164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Condylar determinants in a patient population: electronic pantograph assessment.
    Payne JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Feb; 24(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 9061626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance angles using computerized pantographic tracings, protrusive interocclusal records, and 3D-CBCT imaging techniques for oral rehabilitation.
    Naqash TA; Chaturvedi S; Yaqoob A; Saquib S; Addas MK; Alfarsi M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):550-554. PubMed ID: 32246664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ARTICULATOR-RELATED REGISTRATION AND ANALYSIS OF SAGITTAL CONDYLAR INCLINATION.
    Cimić S; Simunković SK; Suncana Simonić Kocijan ; Matijević J; Dulcić N; Catić A
    Acta Clin Croat; 2015 Dec; 54(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 27017716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study.
    Singh K; Singh A; Jayam C; Singh R; Huda I; Nabi AT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 34028362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preliminary clinical study of the accuracy of a digital axiographic recording system for the assessment of sagittal condylar inclination.
    Lepidi L; Grande F; Baldassarre G; Suriano C; Li J; Catapano S
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104583. PubMed ID: 37331577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guided versus unguided mandibular movement for duplicating intraoral eccentric tooth contacts in the articulator.
    Celar AG; Tamaki K; Nitsche S; Schneider B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jan; 81(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 9878970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow.
    Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):904-8. PubMed ID: 9467992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of TMJ dysfunction on Bennett movement as recorded by a modified pantograph. Part II: Pilot articulator study.
    Simonet PF; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Nov; 46(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 6946222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of the lateral condylar adjustment of nonarcon semiadjustable articulators.
    Taylor TD; Huber LR; Aquilino SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jul; 54(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 3860652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Graphic tracings of condylar paths and measurements of condylar angles.
    el-Gheriani AS; Winstanley RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 2915339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships.
    Campos AA; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans.
    Prasad KD; Shah N; Hegde C
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Oct; 3(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 23633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Determination of the condylar trajectory using extraoral registration (the Axio-Quick system), in comparison with intraoral registration in wax].
    del Rio Highsmith J; Lopez Lozano JF; Martinez Vazquez de Parga JA
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1989; 1(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 2700618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The intraoral determination of the sagittal condyle path inclination during face-bow recording].
    Bernard N; Utz KH; Schmitt L
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7855576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.