These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26685149)

  • 1. Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.
    Farrell AM; Brazier M
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 26685149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes to the law on consent following Montgomery vs Lanarkshire Health Board.
    Clearkin L
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2016 Jun; 77(6):355-7. PubMed ID: 27269751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Montgomery on informed consent: an inexpert decision?
    Montgomery J; Montgomery E
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 26811487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Between the Reasonable and the Particular: Deflating Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Informed Consent to Medical Treatment.
    Dunn M; Fulford KWM; Herring J; Handa A
    Health Care Anal; 2019 Jun; 27(2):110-127. PubMed ID: 29961214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    Smith MK; Carver T
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 44(6):384-388. PubMed ID: 29572339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Montgomery consent': decision of the UK Supreme Court. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [20151. [2015] UKSC 11; [2015] WLR 768.
    Beckett H; Radford J
    Pract Midwife; 2016 Jun; 19(6):27-9. PubMed ID: 27451489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient autonomy within real or valid consent: Samira Kohli's case.
    Subramani S
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 28195536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The changing paradigm of the doctor-patient relationship: Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board and developments in the 'duty to warn'.
    Sizer L; Arnold P
    N Z Med J; 2016 Jan; 129(1429):71-6. PubMed ID: 26914302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Innovation, informed consent, health research and the Supreme Court: Montgomery v Lanarkshire - a brave new world?
    Mchale JV
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2017 Oct; 12(4):435-452. PubMed ID: 28446256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Think of the Children: Liability for Non-Disclosure of Information Post-Montgomery.
    Cave E; Purshouse C
    Med Law Rev; 2020 May; 28(2):270-292. PubMed ID: 31504791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' perceived purpose of clinical informed consent: Mill's individual autonomy model is preferred.
    Hammami MM; Al-Gaai EA; Al-Jawarneh Y; Amer H; Hammami MB; Eissa A; Qadire MA
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Jan; 15():2. PubMed ID: 24406020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One step forward, two steps back? The GMC, the common law and 'informed' consent.
    Fovargue S; Miola J
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Aug; 36(8):494-7. PubMed ID: 20663767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Bolam' to 'Montgomery' is result of evolutionary change of medical practice towards 'patient-centred care'.
    Lee A
    Postgrad Med J; 2017 Jan; 93(1095):46-50. PubMed ID: 27466410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Transmutation of Deference in Medicine: An Ethico-Legal Perspective.
    Devaney S; Holm S
    Med Law Rev; 2018 May; 26(2):202-224. PubMed ID: 29669017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The right of patients to make autonomous choices: Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: a landmark decision on information disclosure to patients in the UK.
    Sutherland Qc L
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jul; 32(7):2005-2010. PubMed ID: 34170342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical consent practice in the UK following the Montgomery ruling: A national cross-sectional questionnaire study.
    McKinnon C; Loughran D; Finn R; Coxwell-Matthewman M; Jeyaretna DS; Williams AP
    Int J Surg; 2018 Jul; 55():66-72. PubMed ID: 29775736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.
    Moulton B; King JS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 20446987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence.
    Berg PE
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 10182216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contemporary interpretation of informed consent: autonomy and paternalism.
    Robertson L
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2016 Jun; 77(6):358-61. PubMed ID: 27269752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.